I think you would need to implement your own container. Looking at
there are a few existing container
implementation that don't use servlet, you could probably just base it off one of
these.
Stuart
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Hixson" <michael.hixson(a)gmail.com>
To: undertow-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Sent: Wednesday, 8 April, 2015 3:12:59 PM
Subject: [undertow-dev] Jersey on Undertow, without servlets?
Hello,
Has anyone run a Jersey application on Undertow, *without* using servlets?
By "using servlets" I mean wrapping an
org.glassfish.jersey.server.ResourceConfig in an
org.glassfish.jersey.servlet.ServletContainer and deploying that with
undertow-servlets. That's pretty easy to do; I don't have any
complaints about it. My question comes mostly from curiosity.
In my application, ServletContainer is the only connection to the
servlet API. My naive view is that the application could be simpler
(in terms of the number of hidden gears turning to process requests)
and more efficient by avoiding the servlet API completely, and by only
using undertow-core. Maybe I'm wrong, or maybe there is so much work
involved that no one in their right mind would try it.
-Michael
_______________________________________________
undertow-dev mailing list
undertow-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/undertow-dev