Re: [undertow-dev] ClosedChannelException
Maybe cloudflare is rejecting some of the websocket upgrades?
Stuart
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Hicks, Matt <matt(a)matthicks.com> wrote:
Well, I seem to have narrowed down the cause to CloudFlare. If I
pause
CloudFlare then it stops happening. The connection is incredibly stable and
was happening consistently.
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 5:26 PM Stuart Douglas <sdouglas(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> I am guessing you are using the websocket client? This would be the
> exception you get if the connection failed. I don't think Undertow
> does any logging, so you must be logging this at the ERROR level.
>
> As to why it is failing it is hard to say. How good is the network
> between the client and the target server, and how often is a lot?
>
> Also what version were you using before 1.4.12.Final?
>
> Stuart
>
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 12:15 AM, Hicks, Matt <matt(a)matthicks.com> wrote:
> > I seem to be experiencing a lot of:
> >
> > [XNIO-1 task-40] ERROR i.y.E.defaultHandler.???:23 -
> > java.nio.channels.ClosedChannelException
> > at io.undertow.protocols.ssl.SslConduit.write(SslConduit.java:369)
> > at
> >
> >
org.xnio.conduits.ConduitStreamSinkChannel.write(ConduitStreamSinkChannel.java:150)
> > at
> >
> >
org.xnio.http.HttpUpgrade$HttpUpgradeState$StringWriteListener.handleEvent(HttpUpgrade.java:385)
> > at
> >
> >
org.xnio.http.HttpUpgrade$HttpUpgradeState$StringWriteListener.handleEvent(HttpUpgrade.java:372)
> > at
> >
> > org.xnio.ChannelListeners.invokeChannelListener(ChannelListeners.java:92)
> > at
> >
> >
org.xnio.conduits.WriteReadyHandler$ChannelListenerHandler.writeReady(WriteReadyHandler.java:65)
> > at
> >
> >
io.undertow.protocols.ssl.SslConduit$SslWriteReadyHandler.writeReady(SslConduit.java:1225)
> > at io.undertow.protocols.ssl.SslConduit$3.run(SslConduit.java:275)
> > at org.xnio.nio.WorkerThread.safeRun(WorkerThread.java:580)
> > at org.xnio.nio.WorkerThread.run(WorkerThread.java:464)
> >
> > I'm not positive this is connected to my update to 1.4.12.Final, but I
> > wanted to check to see if this is something anyone else is seeing? It's
> > likely it's related to my code, although I have no idea what I would
> > have
> > changed to cause this.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > undertow-dev mailing list
> > undertow-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/undertow-dev