Re: [undertow-dev] awesome
BTW, do you know any standard headers I could use to forward
security
information?
Not really. We use SSL_CLIENT_CERT, SSL_CIPHER and SSL_SESSION_ID to forward certificate
information to back end servers, but that is in no way standard (basically I just used the
same headers that JBoss Web did).
Stuart
On 11/21/2014 7:00 AM, Stuart Douglas wrote:
> Also do you have any details posted somewhere about how you did it?
>
> Stuart
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Stuart Douglas" <sdouglas(a)redhat.com>
>> To: "Bill Burke" <bburke(a)redhat.com>
>> Cc: undertow-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> Sent: Friday, 21 November, 2014 7:06:43 PM
>> Subject: Re: [undertow-dev] awesome
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Bill Burke" <bburke(a)redhat.com>
>>> To: undertow-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> Sent: Friday, 21 November, 2014 2:13:03 PM
>>> Subject: [undertow-dev] awesome
>>>
>>> I couldn't believe how easy it was to create an http security proxy for
>>> Keycloak using undertow. Undertow was insanely modular and easy to
>>> piece together how I wanted. Great work guys.
>>
>> Awesome :-)
>>
>> Stuart
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> --
>>> Bill Burke
>>> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>>> http://bill.burkecentral.com
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> undertow-dev mailing list
>>> undertow-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/undertow-dev
>>>
>>
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com