Re: [undertow-dev] Resource Handling Revisited

Bill, though you're probably right, I still believe this would be useful functionality for one-off resource handling without requiring a resource handler. On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 8:59 PM Bill O'Neil <bill(a)dartalley.com&gt; wrote: > > You should be able to handle all of your use cases by composing handlers > together. Create a new handler that handles security or the database logic > then delegates to an internal resource handler with the appropriate path. > > On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 9:50 PM, Hicks, Matt <matt(a)matthicks.com&gt; wrote: >> >> The problem with ResourceHandler is it doesn't easily support more >> complex scenarios. A few examples: security on resources, URLs that must >> find a resource path from the database, conditional resources (deliver >> resource A if the IP is x.x.x.x and resource B otherwise), etc. >> >> Offering a more granular control to allow delivery of individual >> resources without the need of a ResourceHandler will drastically improve the >> flexibility of Undertow. >> >> On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 4:46 PM Stuart Douglas <sdouglas(a)redhat.com&gt; >> wrote: >>> >>> I would be ok with that, however why can't you just use the >>> ResourceHandler? PathResourceManager will use transferFrom if the file >>> is larger than a configured minimum (the transferMinSize parameter in >>> the constructor). >>> >>> Stuart >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 1:52 AM, Hicks, Matt <matt(a)matthicks.com&gt; wrote: >>> > Previously I've asked about streaming a single file back to the client >>> > and >>> > got some good insight as to how to accomplish this with >>> > `transferFrom`, but >>> > this misses out on all the extra features like resuming transfers, >>> > cached >>> > content, etc. It would be very nice Undertow offered a static utility >>> > method to serve up File, Path, and URL providing all of this >>> > functionality >>> > that is currently contained in ResourceHandler >>> > >>> > (https://github.com/undertow-io/undertow/blob/master/core/src/main/java/io...). >>> > >>> > I don't think it would be difficult to extract all of that out of the >>> > private method and simply have ResourceHandler call the static method. >>> > Stuart, what do you think? >>> > >>> > I'd even be willing to do the leg-work if you'd be willing to accept a >>> > PR >>> > for it. >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > undertow-dev mailing list >>> > undertow-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/undertow-dev >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> undertow-dev mailing list >> undertow-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/undertow-dev > >