Re: [undertow-dev] undertow is redirecting?

This is an issue that will be fixed once the latest Undertow release is merged into WF core. It came about as a result of fixing https://issues.jboss.org/browse/UNDERTOW-89 With the latest code it only redirects if the target is the war root without a / and the target servlet is registered as the default servlet. I have done a Undertow release with this fix, I just need to sort out some of the development mode stuff before it can be merged into core. Stuart > > > On Aug 6, 2013, at 6:55 PM, Bill Burke <bburke(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > >> Client is doing a get request: >> >> GET /jaxrs_spec_resource_requestmatching_web HTTP/1.1 >> >> >> Response is is a 302. Notice that there is no trailing / for the path. >> Is this part of tthe servlet spec or something? > > Is this a WAR root or subdirectory (and not a servlet)? if so then yes, take > a look at section 10.10 of the servlet spec. It just uses the term > "redirect" and in all other places in the spec they refer to 302 with the > word redirect, and never 301. > > >> Did Undertow used to >> send a 301, or just invoke on the war's root? > > I think it used to forward. > >> >> I have a JAX-RS TCK test that is regressing. It is expecting a 200 or >> 301 response back from the server. I need to know how to word the >> challenge to allow 302 as well, or Undertow needs to be fixed. > > I am not sure which makes more sense. 301 would be more efficient but I can > think of some contrived scenarios where you change the layout of your war > and the client misbehaves. > > e.g you have foo.war/blah/ as a directory but then you later map blah to a > servlet, so then the servlet gets the trailing slash which it somehow > mishandles. > > Hmm. As I say that I am leaning more towards 301. > > IMO the TCK should accept any redirect status code, since it is not > restricted in the spec. > > >> >> Thanks, >> >> Bill >> >> -- >> Bill Burke >> JBoss, a division of Red Hat >> http://bill.burkecentral.com >> _______________________________________________ >> undertow-dev mailing list >> undertow-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/undertow-dev > > _______________________________________________ > undertow-dev mailing list > undertow-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/undertow-dev >