Re: [undertow-dev] Predicate Language

Somehow I completely missed your reply on this Stuart! Thanks for providing that information. I'm looking forward to what undertow 3 will bring. In the meantime, did you see my question about getting a new component added to JIRA? Also, any feedback on the tickets? If my logging additions go well, my team will be more familiar with how all the internals work so hopefully we can help out with some of those tickets in the form of pull requests.

Thanks! ~Brad *Developer Advocate* *Ortus Solutions, Corp * E-mail: brad(a)coldbox.org ColdBox Platform: http://www.coldbox.org Blog: http://www.codersrevolution.com On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 5:03 PM Stuart Douglas <sdouglas(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > > On Thu, 18 Jun 2020 at 03:24, Brad Wood <bdw429s(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > >> I'm working on an integration with Undertow's Predicate language in my >> Undertow-powered project, CommandBox. I just wanted to say, this feature >> is super sweet and it's really going to provide a lot of value for my users >> to toss in quick text-based rules to control their server. >> >> In case anyone else using this feature is curious, I've compiled a list >> of missing features and bugs from our initial proof of concept phase and >> I've entered the tickets below. I'm willing to help send pulls for some of >> these, though I am a little curious regarding the future of Undertow and if >> Undertow 3 is really happening any time soon at this point or if I should >> just be focusing on Undertow 2.x for the foreseeable future. >> > > Undertow 3 will basically be based on the Quarkus HTTP code ( > https://github.com/quarkusio/quarkus-http). This takes Undertow, removes > XNIO, and adds a connector layer to allow multiple connectors. Currently > this only has a vert.x based connector, but as part of this work we would > also add a pure Netty one so there is no required Vert.x dependency. Once > this has been done the 'quarkus-http' repository will be archived. > > Unfortunately everyone on the team has been extremely busy so it is hard > to say exactly when this will happen, so for now I would focus on 2.x. From > a users point of view there are definitely some API changes (the biggest > one being no XNIO), but all the concepts should be pretty similar, so it > should be relatively easy to port a 2.x app to 3.x. > > Stuart > > >> >> Also, on a side note, could a JIRA admin please add a "Predicate >> Language" component in JIRA for me to tag these tickets with? >> >> *Predicate Language Redirect handler doesn't allow custom status code* >> https://issues.redhat.com/browse/UNDERTOW-1734 >> *Predicate Language handler to set inline response body* >> https://issues.redhat.com/browse/UNDERTOW-1736 >> *Predicate Language response-code handler doesn't allow custom status >> text* >> https://issues.redhat.com/browse/UNDERTOW-1735 >> *Predicate Language access-control handler doesn't have failure-status >> parameter* >> https://issues.redhat.com/browse/UNDERTOW-1737 >> *Relax case sensitivity in Predicate Language for ease of use* >> https://issues.redhat.com/browse/UNDERTOW-1738 >> *Sub groups don't work with nested predicate* >> https://issues.redhat.com/browse/UNDERTOW-1739 >> *Predicate Language parsing fails on semi-colon before "else" keyword* >> https://issues.redhat.com/browse/UNDERTOW-1740 >> >> Thanks! >> >> ~Brad >> >> *Developer Advocate* >> *Ortus Solutions, Corp * >> >> E-mail: brad(a)coldbox.org >> ColdBox Platform: http://www.coldbox.org >> Blog: http://www.codersrevolution.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> undertow-dev mailing list >> undertow-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/undertow-dev > >