Re: [undertow-dev] undertow is redirecting?

From: "Jason Greene" <jgreene(a)redhat.com&gt; To: "Stuart Douglas" <sdouglas(a)redhat.com&gt; Cc: "Bill Burke" <bburke(a)redhat.com&gt;, undertow-dev(a)lists.jboss.org Sent: Wednesday, 7 August, 2013 4:23:27 PM Subject: Re: [undertow-dev] undertow is redirecting? It's not just content root's that need to be redirected, but also all subdirectories. Check out the rules in 10.10 On Aug 7, 2013, at 2:36 AM, Stuart Douglas <sdouglas(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > This is an issue that will be fixed once the latest Undertow release is > merged into WF core. It came about as a result of fixing > > https://issues.jboss.org/browse/UNDERTOW-89 > > With the latest code it only redirects if the target is the war root > without a / and the target servlet is registered as the default servlet. > > I have done a Undertow release with this fix, I just need to sort out some > of the development mode stuff before it can be merged into core. > > Stuart > >> >> >> On Aug 6, 2013, at 6:55 PM, Bill Burke <bburke(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >> >>> Client is doing a get request: >>> >>> GET /jaxrs_spec_resource_requestmatching_web HTTP/1.1 >>> >>> >>> Response is is a 302. Notice that there is no trailing / for the path. >>> Is this part of tthe servlet spec or something? >> >> Is this a WAR root or subdirectory (and not a servlet)? if so then yes, >> take >> a look at section 10.10 of the servlet spec. It just uses the term >> "redirect" and in all other places in the spec they refer to 302 with the >> word redirect, and never 301. >> >> >>> Did Undertow used to >>> send a 301, or just invoke on the war's root? >> >> I think it used to forward. >> >>> >>> I have a JAX-RS TCK test that is regressing. It is expecting a 200 or >>> 301 response back from the server. I need to know how to word the >>> challenge to allow 302 as well, or Undertow needs to be fixed. >> >> I am not sure which makes more sense. 301 would be more efficient but I >> can >> think of some contrived scenarios where you change the layout of your war >> and the client misbehaves. >> >> e.g you have foo.war/blah/ as a directory but then you later map blah to a >> servlet, so then the servlet gets the trailing slash which it somehow >> mishandles. >> >> Hmm. As I say that I am leaning more towards 301. >> >> IMO the TCK should accept any redirect status code, since it is not >> restricted in the spec. >> >> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Bill >>> >>> -- >>> Bill Burke >>> JBoss, a division of Red Hat >>> http://bill.burkecentral.com >>> _______________________________________________ >>> undertow-dev mailing list >>> undertow-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/undertow-dev >> >> _______________________________________________ >> undertow-dev mailing list >> undertow-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/undertow-dev >>