We're still using 1.1.x to keep code churn to a minimum - internal deadlines on this
end have required me to back-port to 1.1.x and build - Looking at your 1.1.x version,
it's functionally identical to the 1.1.x I prepared locally, I'll keep with our
version, there is no need to cut a 1.1.x for us.
For others encountering UNDERTOW-479, if they are using seam I'd suggest they look at
JBSEAM-4861
Fresh data:
It looks like we ran into
which set us up for
the deadlock in Undertow by causing multiple threads to pile up on the
org.jboss.seam.Component.createFromFactory() call.
- Looks like Seam versions prior to 2.3.0.CR1 help create the Undertow hang. This
includes the Seam 2.2.x (which we use).
The fix to Undertow makes recovery from long blocks in createFromFactory() possible.
The fix to JBSEAM-4861 makes the initial failure unlikely, and appears to introduce new
deadlock problems. Threading in complex settings is never easy.
//EricP
-----Original Message-----
From: Stuart Douglas [mailto:sdouglas@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 10:57 AM
To: Eric Peters
Cc: undertow-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Subject: Re: [undertow-dev] InSessionMemoryManager synchronized methods
This has been backported to the 1.2 and 1.1 branches.
Which branch are you on? I will try and get a release out this week.
Stuart
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eric Peters" <epeters(a)epicor.com>
To: undertow-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Sent: Wednesday, 1 July, 2015 8:44:46 PM
Subject: Re: [undertow-dev] InSessionMemoryManager synchronized
methods
I’m still trying to gauge the release process for Undertow, and where
in that process this issue sits, so as to decide how to roll things
out to customers on my end:
- I see UNDERTOW-479 was entered for this deadlock.
- I see a patch for this was pulled into Undertow 1.3.0 Beta 3
- The patch has not been back-ported to prior releases.
- The Jira case is still open.
What can I expect to see in the coming days? I need an answer to give
management for the question of ‘How soon will the patch be deemed
production-ready?’, but I’d appreciate any additional insight that can
be provided.
//EricP
From: Eric Peters
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 5:23 PM
To: Eric Peters; undertow-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Subject: RE: InSessionMemoryManager synchronized methods
I stand corrected – This is 50% of what brought our server down.
The other half of the deadlock belongs to Seam:
*
io.undertow.server.session.InMemorySessionManager$SessionImpl.bumpTimeout()
(line: 271)
*
io.undertow.server.session.InMemorySessionManager$SessionImpl.getAttribute(java.lang.String)
(line: 355)
* io.undertow.servlet.spec.HttpSessionImpl.getAttribute(java.lang.String)
* com.sun.faces.context.SessionMap.get(java.lang.Object)
* org.jboss.seam.contexts.ServerConversationContext.get(java.lang.String)
(line: 110)
*
org.jboss.seam.contexts.Contexts.lookupInStatefulContexts(java.lang.String)
(line: 189)
* org.jboss.seam.Component.getInstanceFromFactory(java.lang.String,
org.jboss.seam.ScopeType) (line: 2088)
* org.jboss.seam.Component.getInstance(java.lang.String, boolean,
boolean, java.lang.Object, org.jboss.seam.ScopeType) (line: 2014)
* org.jboss.seam.Component.getInstance(java.lang.String, boolean,
boolean) (line: 1986)
* org.jboss.seam.Component.getInstance(java.lang.String, boolean)
* org.jboss.seam.Namespace.getComponentInstance(java.lang.String,
boolean)
org.jboss.seam.Component.getInstanceFromFactory() obtains a lock that
has static scope, so nothing else can invoke getInstanceFromFacotry()
while the lock is held.It then blocks on
InMemorySessionManager$SessionImpl.bumpTimeout()
Meanwhile, the invalidate() method blocks against the static method in
getInstanceFromFactory()
//EricP
From: undertow-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [
mailto:undertow-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org ] On Behalf Of Eric Peters
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 4:39 PM
To: undertow-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Subject: [undertow-dev] InSessionMemoryManager synchronized methods
Chasing after another problem I found several blocked task threads,
best as I can determine:
InMemorySessionmanager$SessionImpl.invalidate() is invoked.
This method is synchronized, and the call blocks inside
SesssionListeners.sessionDestroyed() (separate issue there…)
Later, InMemorySessionmanager$SessionImpl.bumpTimeout() is invoked
from another thread.
This method is also synchronized, and blocks waiting for invalidate()
to complete. As the first thread is indefinitely blocked inside
invalidate(), this second thread also remains blocked indefinitely.
In my environment it appears to make an existing problem slightly more
severe.
Found in 1.1.0, but it looks like it’s in both 1.1.7 and the master
branch as well.
Using RHEL, Java 7, Wildfly 8.2
invalidate() Thread trace (excerpt):
* (blocked) - sun.misc.Unsafe.park(boolean, long)
* …
*
org.jboss.seam.contexts.ServletLifecycle.endSession(javax.servlet.http.HttpSession)
(line: 187)
*
org.jboss.seam.servlet.SeamListener.sessionDestroyed(javax.servlet.http.HttpSessionEvent)
(line: 59)
*
io.undertow.servlet.core.ApplicationListeners.sessionDestroyed(javax.servlet.http.HttpSession)
(line: 264)
*
io.undertow.servlet.core.SessionListenerBridge.sessionDestroyed(io.undertow.server.session.Session,
io.undertow.server.HttpServerExchange,
io.undertow.server.session.SessionListener$SessionDestroyedReason)
(line: 67)
*
io.undertow.server.session.SessionListeners.sessionDestroyed(io.undertow.server.session.Session,
io.undertow.server.HttpServerExchange,
io.undertow.server.session.SessionListener$SessionDestroyedReason)
(line: 61)
*
io.undertow.server.session.InMemorySessionManager$SessionImpl.invalidate(io.undertow.server.HttpServerExchange,
io.undertow.server.session.SessionListener$SessionDestroyedReason)
(line: 413)
*
io.undertow.server.session.InMemorySessionManager$SessionImpl.invalidate(io.undertow.server.HttpServerExchange)
(line: 399)
* io.undertow.servlet.spec.HttpSessionImpl.invalidate() (line: 197)
* …
bumpTimeout() Thread trace:
*
io.undertow.server.session.InMemorySessionManager$SessionImpl.bumpTimeout()
(line: 271)
*
io.undertow.server.session.InMemorySessionManager$SessionImpl.getAttribute(java.lang.String)
(line: 355)
*
io.undertow.servlet.util.SavedRequest.tryRestoreRequest(io.undertow.server.HttpServerExchange,
javax.servlet.http.HttpSession) (line: 124)
*
io.undertow.servlet.handlers.security.CachedAuthenticatedSessionHandler.handleRequest(io.undertow.server.HttpServerExchange)
(line: 67)
*
io.undertow.security.handlers.SecurityInitialHandler.handleRequest(io.undertow.server.HttpServerExchange)
(line: 76)
*
io.undertow.server.handlers.PredicateHandler.handleRequest(io.undertow.server.HttpServerExchange)
(line: 43)
*
org.wildfly.extension.undertow.security.jacc.JACCContextIdHandler.handleRequest(io.undertow.server.HttpServerExchange)
(line: 61)
*
io.undertow.server.handlers.PredicateHandler.handleRequest(io.undertow.server.HttpServerExchange)
(line: 43)
*
io.undertow.server.handlers.PredicateHandler.handleRequest(io.undertow.server.HttpServerExchange)
(line: 43)
*
io.undertow.servlet.handlers.ServletInitialHandler.handleFirstRequest(io.undertow.server.HttpServerExchange,
io.undertow.servlet.handlers.ServletChain,
io.undertow.servlet.handlers.ServletRequestContext,
javax.servlet.ServletRequest, javax.servlet.ServletResponse) (line: 261)
*
io.undertow.servlet.handlers.ServletInitialHandler.dispatchRequest(io.undertow.server.HttpServerExchange,
io.undertow.servlet.handlers.ServletRequestContext,
io.undertow.servlet.handlers.ServletChain, javax.servlet.DispatcherType)
(line: 247)
*
io.undertow.servlet.handlers.ServletInitialHandler.access$000(io.undertow.servlet.handlers.ServletInitialHandler,
io.undertow.server.HttpServerExchange,
io.undertow.servlet.handlers.ServletRequestContext,
io.undertow.servlet.handlers.ServletChain, javax.servlet.DispatcherType)
*
io.undertow.servlet.handlers.ServletInitialHandler$1.handleRequest(io.undertow.server.HttpServerExchange)
(line: 166)
*
io.undertow.server.Connectors.executeRootHandler(io.undertow.server.HttpHandler,
io.undertow.server.HttpServerExchange) (line: 197)
* io.undertow.server.HttpServerExchange$1.run() (line: 759)
*
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker)
(line: 1145)
* java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run() (line: 615)
* java.lang.Thread.run() (line: 745)
//EricP
This message has been scanned for malware by Websense.
www.websense.com
Click here to report this email as spam.
_______________________________________________
undertow-dev mailing list
undertow-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/undertow-dev