I looked some more and cancellation would be a huge change - I'm going
to see how far I can get by using the existing callback for flow
control.
-pete
--
(peter.royal|osi)(a)pobox.com -
http://fotap.org/~osi
On Wed, Jul 6, 2016, at 09:43 PM, Stuart Douglas wrote:
Some of the methods take a WebSocketCallback that will notify you on
completion or error, however at the moment there is no way to cancel a
message.
Stuart
On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 6:56 AM, peter royal <peter.royal(a)pobox.com>
wrote:
> I am finding that sometimes I have WebSocket connections that are unable
> to flush messages out the socket at the rate I am generating messages.
>
> I'm using the core.WebSockets class to send messages. Is it possible to
> achieve this with what exists currently? My initial guess is no..
> conceptually it would be nice for core.WebSockets to return a
> CompletableFuture-style object that would let me get a callback when the
> message is sent, or have the ability to cancel it if it is still sitting
> in the send queue.
>
> I'm happy to help build something into Undertow if it is a welcome
> addition.
>
> -pete
>
> --
> (peter.royal|osi)(a)pobox.com -
http://fotap.org/~osi
> _______________________________________________
> undertow-dev mailing list
> undertow-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/undertow-dev