Re: [undertow-dev] Proposed Low Level Web Sockets API
I think we should base the JSR356 support on a lower level fully async API.
I don't think we should use this API as the basis for all our web socket support, as
that will make it much more difficult to do non-spec enhancements.
Stuart
jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 10/09/2012 10:30 AM, Stuart Douglas wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> So I have just been thinking about the low level web socket API, and
> basically I think it should look something like:
So that is the lowest layer to implement is
http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=356 correct?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic