[undertow-dev] Max and Min content size predicates are implemented backwards

These two predicates from undertow are named/implemented backwards. The "max" should be ensuring the provided value is at least *as small or smaller* and the "min" should be ensuring the provided value is at least *as big or bigger*. But here are the descriptions of each one. *MinContentSizePredicate* *MaxContentSizePredicate* So to spell it out, if someone uses the following predicate: max-content-size(5) That means they are saying the maximum content size is 5 bytes. So, here's a quick truth table: - If content length is *4 bytes *-> should return *true *(under the max) - if content length is *5 bytes *-> should return *true *(at the max, but not over) - if content length is *6 bytes *-> should return *false *(over the max) But this is the exact opposite of how these predicates have been implemented. The javadoc matches the behavior, but not the name. Can I get a quick confirmation this is, in fact, backwards before I enter a ticket and/or pull request. Note, this will be a breaking change to fix. Thanks! ~Brad *Developer Advocate* *Ortus Solutions, Corp * E-mail: brad(a)coldbox.org ColdBox Platform: http://www.coldbox.org Blog: http://www.codersrevolution.com