9:12 a.m.
Hi all,
I'd like to have understanding of what was going on with
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/UNDERTOW-349, in which under some
circumstance the io.undertow.server.handlers.RequestLimit got corrupted and
could not process Queue correctly,
probably someone could kindly explain me more ?
btw. after digest below mailing list, I still could not figure out what was
wrong with RequestLimit (
http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/undertow-dev/2014-December/001049.html )
2:13 p.m.
The exchange completion listener was added two early. If a request was
rejected then this would cause the count to go negative (as the count
would be decreased without ever having been increased).
Stuart
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 2:12 AM, tone randomnaja <randomnaja(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to have understanding of what was going on with
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/UNDERTOW-349, in which under some
circumstance the io.undertow.server.handlers.RequestLimit got corrupted and
could not process Queue correctly,
probably someone could kindly explain me more ?
btw. after digest below mailing list, I still could not figure out what was
wrong with RequestLimit (
http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/undertow-dev/2014-December/001049.html )
_______________________________________________
undertow-dev mailing list
undertow-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/undertow-dev
10:07 p.m.
how the request was rejected ? by which criteria or event ?
On Jan 12, 2017 03:13, "Stuart Douglas" <sdouglas(a)redhat.com> wrote:
The exchange completion listener was added two early. If a request
was
rejected then this would cause the count to go negative (as the count
would be decreased without ever having been increased).
Stuart
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 2:12 AM, tone randomnaja <randomnaja(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to have understanding of what was going on with
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/UNDERTOW-349, in which under some
> circumstance the io.undertow.server.handlers.RequestLimit got corrupted
and
> could not process Queue correctly,
>
> probably someone could kindly explain me more ?
>
> btw. after digest below mailing list, I still could not figure out what
was
> wrong with RequestLimit (
> http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/undertow-dev/2014-December/001049.html
)
>
> _______________________________________________
> undertow-dev mailing list
> undertow-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/undertow-dev
10:23 p.m.
If there was a max queue size and the queue was full the request would
be rejected.
Stuart
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 3:07 PM, tone randomnaja <randomnaja(a)gmail.com> wrote:
how the request was rejected ? by which criteria or event ?
On Jan 12, 2017 03:13, "Stuart Douglas" <sdouglas(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> The exchange completion listener was added two early. If a request was
> rejected then this would cause the count to go negative (as the count
> would be decreased without ever having been increased).
>
> Stuart
>
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 2:12 AM, tone randomnaja <randomnaja(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'd like to have understanding of what was going on with
> > https://issues.jboss.org/browse/UNDERTOW-349, in which under some
> > circumstance the io.undertow.server.handlers.RequestLimit got corrupted
> > and
> > could not process Queue correctly,
> >
> > probably someone could kindly explain me more ?
> >
> > btw. after digest below mailing list, I still could not figure out what
> > was
> > wrong with RequestLimit (
> > http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/undertow-dev/2014-December/001049.html
> > )
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > undertow-dev mailing list
> > undertow-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/undertow-dev
11:01 p.m.
Oh, I through that failureHandle would also get the Exchange completed, and
listenner be called ?
On Jan 12, 2017 11:23, "Stuart Douglas" <sdouglas(a)redhat.com> wrote:
If there was a max queue size and the queue was full the request
would
be rejected.
Stuart
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 3:07 PM, tone randomnaja <randomnaja(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> how the request was rejected ? by which criteria or event ?
>
> On Jan 12, 2017 03:13, "Stuart Douglas" <sdouglas(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
>>
>> The exchange completion listener was added two early. If a request was
>> rejected then this would cause the count to go negative (as the count
>> would be decreased without ever having been increased).
>>
>> Stuart
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 2:12 AM, tone randomnaja <randomnaja(a)gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > I'd like to have understanding of what was going on with
>> > https://issues.jboss.org/browse/UNDERTOW-349, in which under some
>> > circumstance the io.undertow.server.handlers.RequestLimit got
corrupted
>> > and
>> > could not process Queue correctly,
>> >
>> > probably someone could kindly explain me more ?
>> >
>> > btw. after digest below mailing list, I still could not figure out
what
>> > was
>> > wrong with RequestLimit (
>> > http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/undertow-dev/2014-
December/001049.html
>> > )
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > undertow-dev mailing list
>> > undertow-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/undertow-dev
2883
days inactive
2884
days old
4 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Stuart Douglas -
tone randomnaja