From: "Andrej Golovnin" <golovnin(a)gmx.net&gt; To: undertow-dev(a)lists.jboss.org Sent: Monday, 4 November, 2013 9:30:07 PM Subject: [undertow-dev] Minor problem with UndertowSession#addMessageHandler(MessageHandler) Hi all, there is a minor problem with the current implementation of UndertowSession#addMessageHandler(MessageHandler). If we have the following MessageHandler implementation: class MessageHandlerImpl implements Part<byte>, Whole<PongMessage> { public void onMessage(byte[] bytes, boolean last) { } public void onMessage(PongMessage pongMessage) { } } then only one of the #onMessage-methods would be added as a message handler (s. FrameHandler#addHandler() and ClassUtils.getHandlerType() for details). The other is ignored. IMO the current Java WebSockets API spec does not prohibits this kind of MessageHandler implementation. Would you say it is a bug in Undertow? Best regards, Andrej Golovnin _______________________________________________ undertow-dev mailing list undertow-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/undertow-dev