9:40 a.m.
Hi team,
I am trying to have a situation like this:
Path A - response is gzipped,
Path B - response is *not* gzipped.
But from extensive searching, I could only figure out a way to make all
paths as gzipped response.
For example:
Undertow.builder().addHttpListener(8080, "localhost").setHandler(new
EncodingHandler(new ContentEncodingRepository().addEncodingHandler(
"gzip",
new GzipEncodingProvider(),
50,
Predicates.parse("max-content-size[5]")
)
).setNext(Handlers.path()
.addPrefixPath("/pathA", pathA::handle)
.addPrefixPath("/pathB", pathAB::handle
)).build();
will make both Path A and Path B as gzip encoded response.
Any way to make only 1 of them give gzipped response?
Regards
--
Girish Sharma
B.Tech(H), Civil Engineering,
Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur
1:09 a.m.
New subject: Combining encoding handlers with non-encoding handlers
Just add the encoding handler to the appropriate prefix path, instead of making it the
root handler, e.g.
.addPrefixPath("/pathA", new EncodingHandler ....)
Stuart
----- Original Message -----
From: "Girish Sharma" <scrapmachines(a)gmail.com>
To: undertow-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Sent: Friday, 7 August, 2015 12:40:10 AM
Subject: [undertow-dev] Combining encoding handlers with non-encoding handlers
Hi team,
I am trying to have a situation like this:
Path A - response is gzipped,
Path B - response is not gzipped.
But from extensive searching, I could only figure out a way to make all paths
as gzipped response.
For example:
Undertow . builder ().addHttpListener(8080, "localhost").setHandler( new
EncodingHandler( new ContentEncodingRepository().addEncodingHandler(
"gzip" ,
new GzipEncodingProvider(),
50 ,
Predicates. parse ( "max-content-size[5]" )
)
).setNext(Handlers. path ()
.addPrefixPath("/pathA", pathA ::handle)
.addPrefixPath("/pathB", pathAB::handle
)).build();
will make both Path A and Path B as gzip encoded response.
Any way to make only 1 of them give gzipped response?
Regards
--
Girish Sharma
B.Tech(H), Civil Engineering ,
Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur
_______________________________________________
undertow-dev mailing list
undertow-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/undertow-dev
2:49 a.m.
Thanks Stuart, it works like that. Seems a bit obvious now that I think of
it :)
Regards
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Stuart Douglas <sdouglas(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
Just add the encoding handler to the appropriate prefix path, instead
of
making it the root handler, e.g.
.addPrefixPath("/pathA", new EncodingHandler ....)
Stuart
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Girish Sharma" <scrapmachines(a)gmail.com>
> To: undertow-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Friday, 7 August, 2015 12:40:10 AM
> Subject: [undertow-dev] Combining encoding handlers with non-encoding
handlers
>
> Hi team,
>
> I am trying to have a situation like this:
>
> Path A - response is gzipped,
> Path B - response is not gzipped.
>
> But from extensive searching, I could only figure out a way to make all
paths
> as gzipped response.
>
> For example:
>
> Undertow . builder ().addHttpListener(8080, "localhost").setHandler( new
> EncodingHandler( new ContentEncodingRepository().addEncodingHandler(
> "gzip" ,
> new GzipEncodingProvider(),
> 50 ,
> Predicates. parse ( "max-content-size[5]" )
> )
> ).setNext(Handlers. path ()
> .addPrefixPath("/pathA", pathA ::handle)
> .addPrefixPath("/pathB", pathAB::handle
> )).build();
>
> will make both Path A and Path B as gzip encoded response.
>
> Any way to make only 1 of them give gzipped response?
>
> Regards
> --
> Girish Sharma
> B.Tech(H), Civil Engineering ,
> Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur
>
> _______________________________________________
> undertow-dev mailing list
> undertow-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/undertow-dev
--
Girish Sharma
B.Tech(H), Civil Engineering,
Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur
3403
days inactive
3407
days old
2 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Girish Sharma -
Stuart Douglas