November 2010 - weld-issues - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (WELD-446) Improve startup times

by Shane Bryzak (JIRA)

Improve startup times --------------------- Key: WELD-446 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/WELD-446 Project: Weld Issue Type: Task Components: Bootstrap and Metamodel API Affects Versions: 1.0.1.CR2 Reporter: Shane Bryzak Assignee: Pete Muir We need to improve startup times for environments such as Google App Engine, which are currently in the range of 4-6 seconds. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

12 years, 2 months

3
4
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (WELD-765) Simplify access to a deployment's BeanManager, when its id (or the BDA id) is known

by Marius Bogoevici (JIRA)

Simplify access to a deployment's BeanManager, when its id (or the BDA id) is known ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: WELD-765 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/browse/WELD-765 Project: Weld Issue Type: Feature Request Components: Weld SPI Affects Versions: 1.1.0.Beta2 Reporter: Marius Bogoevici Fix For: 1.1.0.Beta3 Currently, the BM id and BDA ID are practically equivalent. Retrieving the BeanManager if said ID is known requires iterating Deployment.getBeanDeploymentArchives() until the BDA is found and then retrieving the BeanManager from the deployment by using Bootstrap.getManager(BeanDeploymentArchive beanDeploymentArchive). This can be simplified by introducing Deployment.getBeanDeploymentArchive(String BDAid). Another possibility is to provide Bootstrap.getManager(String bdaID). Both variants would simplify the access code and make it work faster. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

12 years, 2 months

5
5
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (WELD-627) Clarify the implementation and usage of WeldClass.getWeldMethods, WelldClass.getDeclaredWeldMethods

by Marius Bogoevici (JIRA)

Clarify the implementation and usage of WeldClass.getWeldMethods, WelldClass.getDeclaredWeldMethods --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: WELD-627 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/browse/WELD-627 Project: Weld Issue Type: Bug Components: Bootstrap and Metamodel API Affects Versions: 1.0.1.Final Reporter: Marius Bogoevici Fix For: 1.1.0.BETA2 The goal for getWeldMethods and getDeclaredWeldMethods is to mimic the behavior of getMethods and getDeclaredMethods as they are defined on java.lang.Class. Introduce a new method - called e.g. getWeldBusinessMethods that returns the methods of the class that can be used for business methods invocations on a particular bean. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

12 years, 2 months

5
8
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (WELD-516) RunnableDecorator incorrectly assumes >0 Runnable beans

by Morten Christensen (JIRA)

RunnableDecorator incorrectly assumes >0 Runnable beans ------------------------------------------------------- Key: WELD-516 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/WELD-516 Project: Weld Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 1.0.1.Final Environment: Java 6 + WeldSE Reporter: Morten Christensen The class org.jboss.weld.environment.se.threading.RunnableDecorator incorrectly assumes that there will be at least one bean that implements Runnable. If there are no beans that implements Runnable then an error like this will happen: org.jboss.weld.DeploymentException: Injection point has unstatisfied dependencies. Injection point: field org.jboss.weld.environment.se.threading.RunnableDecorator.runnable; Qualifiers: [@javax.enterprise.inject.Default()] at org.jboss.weld.Validator.validateInjectionPoint(Validator.java:232) at org.jboss.weld.Validator.validateBean(Validator.java:80) at org.jboss.weld.Validator.validateRIBean(Validator.java:100) at org.jboss.weld.Validator.validateBeans(Validator.java:282) at org.jboss.weld.Validator.validateDeployment(Validator.java:267) at org.jboss.weld.bootstrap.WeldBootstrap.validateBeans(WeldBootstrap.java:389) at org.jboss.weld.environment.se.Weld.initialize(Weld.java:81) at org.jboss.weld.environment.se.StartMain.go(StartMain.java:45) at org.jboss.weld.environment.se.StartMain.main(StartMain.java:57) I guess the field "runnable" inside this class should be changed to use Instance<Runnable> instead. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

12 years, 2 months

6
12
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (CDITCK-63) Test decorators and interceptors in other scopes than @Dependent

by Marius Bogoevici (JIRA)

Test decorators and interceptors in other scopes than @Dependent ---------------------------------------------------------------- Key: CDITCK-63 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/CDITCK-63 Project: CDI TCK Issue Type: Feature Request Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Reporter: Marius Bogoevici Prompted by https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/WELD-296 (at the time when the issue was reported decorators were not working correctly with client proxies). This is an implied assertion, but due to the complexity of the implementation, it is still desirable to see that the implementation handles it correctly. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

12 years, 3 months

3
7
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (CDITCK-172) Tests needed for transactional observers that initiate, commit or rollback transactions

by David Allen (JIRA)

Tests needed for transactional observers that initiate, commit or rollback transactions --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: CDITCK-172 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/browse/CDITCK-172 Project: CDI TCK Issue Type: Feature Request Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Affects Versions: 1.1.0.CR1 Reporter: David Allen Priority: Minor Tests for the following assertion can be implemented and require the container to provide its own UserTransaction to prohibit the calls from succeeding: 10.5 (bd) An observer method may not directly initiate, commit or rollback JTA transactions. At the moment, the specification does not really specify what happens if an observer method does make these calls. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

12 years, 3 months

3
3
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (CDITCK-73) Test abstract decorators functionally

by Marius Bogoevici (JIRA)

Test abstract decorators functionally ------------------------------------- Key: CDITCK-73 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/CDITCK-73 Project: CDI TCK Issue Type: Feature Request Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Affects Versions: 1.0.0.GA Reporter: Marius Bogoevici Fix For: 1.0.1.CR1 The current assertions for abstract decorators are just testing that abstract classes annotated with decorators can be enabled and are resolved correctly. However, no functionality test involving abstract decorators is carried out. The assertions should test that: a) abstract decorators can be applied at all (i.e. instantiated) b) methods which are not decorating methods of the decorated type cannot be abstract (DefinitionException) c) when abstract decorating method are called as part of the decorator chain, they are actually deferring the call to the injected delegate -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

12 years, 3 months

3
3
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (CDITCK-41) Remove lib/ directories, and instead provide maven goal that will generate lib/

by Pete Muir (JIRA)

Remove lib/ directories, and instead provide maven goal that will generate lib/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: CDITCK-41 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/CDITCK-41 Project: CDI TCK Issue Type: Feature Request Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Components: Infrastructure Reporter: Pete Muir Fix For: 1.0.0.CR3 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

12 years, 3 months

2
2
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (CDITCK-52) Add all tests suitable for EEJB environment to "eejb" group

by Pete Muir (JIRA)

Add all tests suitable for EEJB environment to "eejb" group ----------------------------------------------------------- Key: CDITCK-52 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/CDITCK-52 Project: CDI TCK Issue Type: Feature Request Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Components: Tests Reporter: Pete Muir Fix For: 1.1.0.CR1 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

12 years, 3 months

2
1
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (CDITCK-61) Some tests have dependencies with jsr299-tck-api.jar and jsr299-tck-impl.jar

by Santiago Pericas-Geertsen (JIRA)

Some tests have dependencies with jsr299-tck-api.jar and jsr299-tck-impl.jar ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: CDITCK-61 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/CDITCK-61 Project: CDI TCK Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Components: Tests Affects Versions: 1.0.1.CR1 Environment: Solaris x86 / JDK 16u6 / GF v3 Reporter: Santiago Pericas-Geertsen We have found that certain TCK test load classes from jsr299-tck-api.jar and jsr299-tck-impl.jar, but these jars are not normally included in the generated application bundles. An example of such a test is: *.deployment.packaging.installedLibrary.WarInstalledLibraryTest.test which looks for: org/jboss/jsr299/tck/tests/deployment/packaging/installedLibrary/Bar This test fails with GF as these classes are not available to applications. Should jsr299-tck-api.jar and jsr299-tck-impl.jar be bundled with apps? (We can provide a complete list of tests that depend on these TCK jars if needed). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

12 years, 3 months

3
8
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

weld-issues November 2010