May 2011 - weld-issues - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (WELD-817) Wrap Contexutal impls passed to Contexts in a serializable wrapper if the context is passivation capable

by Pete Muir (JIRA)

Wrap Contexutal impls passed to Contexts in a serializable wrapper if the context is passivation capable -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: WELD-817 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WELD-817 Project: Weld Issue Type: Feature Request Reporter: Pete Muir Fix For: 1.2.0.Beta1 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

12 years, 2 months

3
4
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (WELD-765) Simplify access to a deployment's BeanManager, when its id (or the BDA id) is known

by Marius Bogoevici (JIRA)

Simplify access to a deployment's BeanManager, when its id (or the BDA id) is known ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: WELD-765 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/browse/WELD-765 Project: Weld Issue Type: Feature Request Components: Weld SPI Affects Versions: 1.1.0.Beta2 Reporter: Marius Bogoevici Fix For: 1.1.0.Beta3 Currently, the BM id and BDA ID are practically equivalent. Retrieving the BeanManager if said ID is known requires iterating Deployment.getBeanDeploymentArchives() until the BDA is found and then retrieving the BeanManager from the deployment by using Bootstrap.getManager(BeanDeploymentArchive beanDeploymentArchive). This can be simplified by introducing Deployment.getBeanDeploymentArchive(String BDAid). Another possibility is to provide Bootstrap.getManager(String bdaID). Both variants would simplify the access code and make it work faster. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

12 years, 2 months

5
5
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (WELD-627) Clarify the implementation and usage of WeldClass.getWeldMethods, WelldClass.getDeclaredWeldMethods

by Marius Bogoevici (JIRA)

Clarify the implementation and usage of WeldClass.getWeldMethods, WelldClass.getDeclaredWeldMethods --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: WELD-627 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/browse/WELD-627 Project: Weld Issue Type: Bug Components: Bootstrap and Metamodel API Affects Versions: 1.0.1.Final Reporter: Marius Bogoevici Fix For: 1.1.0.BETA2 The goal for getWeldMethods and getDeclaredWeldMethods is to mimic the behavior of getMethods and getDeclaredMethods as they are defined on java.lang.Class. Introduce a new method - called e.g. getWeldBusinessMethods that returns the methods of the class that can be used for business methods invocations on a particular bean. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

12 years, 2 months

5
8
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (WELD-516) RunnableDecorator incorrectly assumes >0 Runnable beans

by Morten Christensen (JIRA)

RunnableDecorator incorrectly assumes >0 Runnable beans ------------------------------------------------------- Key: WELD-516 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/WELD-516 Project: Weld Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 1.0.1.Final Environment: Java 6 + WeldSE Reporter: Morten Christensen The class org.jboss.weld.environment.se.threading.RunnableDecorator incorrectly assumes that there will be at least one bean that implements Runnable. If there are no beans that implements Runnable then an error like this will happen: org.jboss.weld.DeploymentException: Injection point has unstatisfied dependencies. Injection point: field org.jboss.weld.environment.se.threading.RunnableDecorator.runnable; Qualifiers: [@javax.enterprise.inject.Default()] at org.jboss.weld.Validator.validateInjectionPoint(Validator.java:232) at org.jboss.weld.Validator.validateBean(Validator.java:80) at org.jboss.weld.Validator.validateRIBean(Validator.java:100) at org.jboss.weld.Validator.validateBeans(Validator.java:282) at org.jboss.weld.Validator.validateDeployment(Validator.java:267) at org.jboss.weld.bootstrap.WeldBootstrap.validateBeans(WeldBootstrap.java:389) at org.jboss.weld.environment.se.Weld.initialize(Weld.java:81) at org.jboss.weld.environment.se.StartMain.go(StartMain.java:45) at org.jboss.weld.environment.se.StartMain.main(StartMain.java:57) I guess the field "runnable" inside this class should be changed to use Instance<Runnable> instead. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

12 years, 2 months

6
12
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (CDI-34) Make special note in the spec about @Named beans (via a stereotype) cannot be selected with Instance.select()

by Shane Bryzak (JIRA)

Make special note in the spec about @Named beans (via a stereotype) cannot be selected with Instance.select() ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: CDI-34 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-34 Project: CDI Specification Issues Issue Type: Feature Request Reporter: Shane Bryzak Priority: Minor For example, say we have the following bean: public @Model class Foo implements IFoo { } And we have the following injection point within another bean: @Inject Instance<Foo> fooInstance; It is not possible to select Foo via name using the Instance: // This results in an UnsatisfiedDependencyException Foo foo = fooInstance.select(new NamedLiteral("foo")).get(); Instead, Foo must be annotated directly with the @Named annotation itself: /* * This Foo can be selected by name */ public @Named @RequestScoped Foo implements IFoo { } This special case might be worthwhile mentioning in the next revision of the spec. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

12 years, 2 months

3
7
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (CDITCK-212) DestroyedInstanceReturnedByGetTest assumes that the application scope can be destroyed and then re-created

by Stuart Douglas (JIRA)

DestroyedInstanceReturnedByGetTest assumes that the application scope can be destroyed and then re-created ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: CDITCK-212 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDITCK-212 Project: CDI TCK Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Reporter: Stuart Douglas Context applicationContext = getCurrentManager().getContext(ApplicationScoped.class); destroyContext(applicationContext); setContextActive(applicationContext); myApplicationBeanInstance = applicationContext.get(myApplicationBean); The spec does not require that the application scope can be destroyed and re-created, if fact it could be argued that this behaviour violates the spec, as the application context is supposed to last for the lifetime of the application. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

12 years, 2 months

3
2
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (WELD-811) Hierarchy injection is not working with external annotation type.

by Rogerio Baldini (JIRA)

Hierarchy injection is not working with external annotation type. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Key: WELD-811 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WELD-811 Project: Weld Issue Type: Bug Components: Weld SPI Affects Versions: 1.1.0.CR3 Reporter: Rogerio Baldini In WeldClassImpl constructor, superclass is set as an Object.class when annotatedType is instanceof ExternalAnnotatedType (discovered flag). Why? This behavior causes a non injection of superclasses fields and methods. Is this correct ? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

12 years, 3 months

6
7
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (CDITCK-63) Test decorators and interceptors in other scopes than @Dependent

by Marius Bogoevici (JIRA)

Test decorators and interceptors in other scopes than @Dependent ---------------------------------------------------------------- Key: CDITCK-63 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/CDITCK-63 Project: CDI TCK Issue Type: Feature Request Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Reporter: Marius Bogoevici Prompted by https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/WELD-296 (at the time when the issue was reported decorators were not working correctly with client proxies). This is an implied assertion, but due to the complexity of the implementation, it is still desirable to see that the implementation handles it correctly. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

12 years, 3 months

3
7
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (CDITCK-172) Tests needed for transactional observers that initiate, commit or rollback transactions

by David Allen (JIRA)

Tests needed for transactional observers that initiate, commit or rollback transactions --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: CDITCK-172 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/browse/CDITCK-172 Project: CDI TCK Issue Type: Feature Request Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Affects Versions: 1.1.0.CR1 Reporter: David Allen Priority: Minor Tests for the following assertion can be implemented and require the container to provide its own UserTransaction to prohibit the calls from succeeding: 10.5 (bd) An observer method may not directly initiate, commit or rollback JTA transactions. At the moment, the specification does not really specify what happens if an observer method does make these calls. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

12 years, 3 months

3
3
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (CDITCK-208) TCK should test bean deployment archive behaviour more thoroughly

by Stuart Douglas (JIRA)

TCK should test bean deployment archive behaviour more thoroughly ------------------------------------------------------------------ Key: CDITCK-208 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDITCK-208 Project: CDI TCK Issue Type: Feature Request Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Components: Tests Reporter: Stuart Douglas Fix For: 1.1.0.CR1 The TCK does not currently test that the behaviour of bean deployment archives confirms to the spec. In particular we need tests for: - Different interceptor ordering between BDA's with the same scope - Tests that all beans in a war are visible to each other (and WEB-INF/classes should be visible to WEB-INF/lib) - Ear /lib is visible to everyone - Portable Extensions are loaded correctly and any beans they define are defined at a global scope (as per the current spec, this may change in 1.1) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

12 years, 3 months

2
2
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

weld-issues May 2011