January 2012 - weld-issues - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss JIRA] (CDITCK-265) ProducerFieldLifecycleTest broken

by Jozef Hartinger (JIRA)

Jozef Hartinger created CDITCK-265: -------------------------------------- Summary: ProducerFieldLifecycleTest broken Key: CDITCK-265 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDITCK-265 Project: CDI TCK Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Reporter: Jozef Hartinger org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.implementation.producer.field.lifecycle.TarantulaConsumer defines the following injection point: {code:JAVA} @Inject @Any private Tarantula consumedTarantula; {code} however, there are multiple beans eligible to the injection point and therefore the deployment fails with AmbiguousDependencyResolutionException: {noformat} WELD-001409 Ambiguous dependencies for type [Tarantula] with qualifiers [@Any] at injection point [[field] @Inject @Any private org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.implementation.producer.field.lifecycle.TarantulaConsumer.consumedTarantula]. Possible dependencies [[Managed Bean [class org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.implementation.producer.field.lifecycle.DefangedTarantula] with qualifiers [@Any @Default], Producer Field [Tarantula] with qualifiers [@Any @Static] declared as [[field] @Static @Produces public static org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.implementation.producer.field.lifecycle.StaticTarantulaProducer.produceTarantula], Managed Bean [class org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.implementation.producer.field.lifecycle.Tarantula] with qualifiers [@Any @Default], Producer Field [Tarantula] with qualifiers [@Any @Default] declared as [[field] @Produces public org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.implementation.producer.field.lifecycle.SpecializedTarantulaProducer.produceTarantula]]] {noformat} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

12 years, 3 months

2
2
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (WELD-977) Specialized bean does not disable producer method of its parent

by Martin Kouba (JIRA)

Specialized bean does not disable producer method of its parent --------------------------------------------------------------- Key: WELD-977 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WELD-977 Project: Weld Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Martin Kouba CDI 1.0 spec states: "When an enabled bean, as defined in Section 5.1.2, Enabled and disabled beans, specializes a second bean, we can be certain that the second bean is never instantiated or called by the container. Even if the second bean defines a producer or observer method, the method will never be called." Weld fulfills outdated spec - probably *1.0 Public Review Draft*. Also TCK test (ProducerMethodDefinitionTest) does. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

12 years, 3 months

3
4
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WELD-986) Interceptors may not declare observer methods

by Martin Kouba (Created) (JIRA)

Interceptors may not declare observer methods --------------------------------------------- Key: WELD-986 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WELD-986 Project: Weld Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 1.1.2.Final Environment: JBoss AS7 Reporter: Martin Kouba CDI 1.0 section 10.4.2 states: Interceptors and decorators may not declare observer methods. If an interceptor or decorator has a method with a paramet- er annotated @Observes, the container automatically detects the problem and treats it as a definition error. However there is no definition error detected for interceptor with observer method. TCK test for this scenario (CDI 1.1 master branch): https://github.com/jboss/cdi-tck/blob/master/impl/src/main/java/org/jboss... -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

12 years, 3 months

3
3
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WELD-1021) Implicit implementation of abstract decorator method with at least one parameter is missing

by Martin Kouba (Created) (JIRA)

Implicit implementation of abstract decorator method with at least one parameter is missing ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: WELD-1021 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WELD-1021 Project: Weld Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Martin Kouba If an abstract decorator declares abstract method and this method is also declared on decorated type, the container should provide an implicit implementation of this method that calls the method on the delegate. However if the method has at least one parameter implementation is missing. TCK test (CDI TCK 1.1): *org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.decorators.definition.DecoratorDefinitionTest.testAbstractDecoratorNotImplementingMethodOfDecoratedType(BankAccount)* {code} java.lang.NoSuchMethodException: org.jboss.interceptor.util.proxy.TargetInstanceProxy.getTargetClass(int) at java.lang.Class.getDeclaredMethod(Class.java:1954) at org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.decorators.definition.1941262783$Proxy$_$$_WeldDecoratorProxy.deposit(1941262783$Proxy$_$$_WeldDecoratorProxy.java) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:616) at org.jboss.weld.util.reflection.SecureReflections$13.work(SecureReflections.java:264) at org.jboss.weld.util.reflection.SecureReflectionAccess.run(SecureReflectionAccess.java:52) at org.jboss.weld.util.reflection.SecureReflectionAccess.runAsInvocation(SecureReflectionAccess.java:137) at org.jboss.weld.util.reflection.SecureReflections.invoke(SecureReflections.java:260) at org.jboss.weld.introspector.jlr.WeldMethodImpl.invokeOnInstance(WeldMethodImpl.java:170) at org.jboss.weld.bean.proxy.DecoratorProxyMethodHandler.doInvoke(DecoratorProxyMethodHandler.java:78) at org.jboss.interceptor.util.proxy.TargetInstanceProxyMethodHandler.invoke(TargetInstanceProxyMethodHandler.java:43) at org.jboss.weld.bean.proxy.TargetBeanInstance.invoke(TargetBeanInstance.java:88) at org.jboss.weld.bean.proxy.ProxyMethodHandler.invoke(ProxyMethodHandler.java:105) at org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.decorators.definition.BankAccount$Proxy$_$$_Weld$Proxy$.deposit(BankAccount$Proxy$_$$_Weld$Proxy$.java) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:616) at org.jboss.weld.util.reflection.SecureReflections$13.work(SecureReflections.java:264) at org.jboss.weld.util.reflection.SecureReflectionAccess.run(SecureReflectionAccess.java:52) at org.jboss.weld.util.reflection.SecureReflectionAccess.runAsInvocation(SecureReflectionAccess.java:137) at org.jboss.weld.util.reflection.SecureReflections.invoke(SecureReflections.java:260) at org.jboss.weld.bean.proxy.CombinedInterceptorAndDecoratorStackMethodHandler.invoke(CombinedInterceptorAndDecoratorStackMethodHandler.java:59) at org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.decorators.definition.-906731491$Proxy$_$$_WeldSubclass.deposit(-906731491$Proxy$_$$_WeldSubclass.java) {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

12 years, 3 months

5
4
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WELD-1034) InjectionPoint injected into a decorated dependent bean returns true for isDelegate()

by Martin Kouba (Created) (JIRA)

InjectionPoint injected into a decorated dependent bean returns true for isDelegate() ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: WELD-1034 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WELD-1034 Project: Weld Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Martin Kouba CDI TCK 1.1 test: *org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.lookup.injectionpoint.InjectionPointTest.testIsDelegate()* See CDI-78 for more information. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

12 years, 3 months

2
1
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WELD-1033) Injected Bean metadata not passivation capable

by Jozef Hartinger (Created) (JIRA)

Injected Bean metadata not passivation capable ---------------------------------------------- Key: WELD-1033 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WELD-1033 Project: Weld Issue Type: Bug Components: Built-in beans Reporter: Jozef Hartinger Assignee: Jozef Hartinger Fix For: 2.0.0.Alpha1 A direct reference is injected instead of a proxy. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

12 years, 4 months

2
1
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WELD-1047) ProcessBeanAttributes is fired for specialized beans

by Martin Kouba (Created) (JIRA)

ProcessBeanAttributes is fired for specialized beans ---------------------------------------------------- Key: WELD-1047 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WELD-1047 Project: Weld Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Martin Kouba Assignee: Jozef Hartinger Fix For: 2.0.0.Alpha1 The spec (CDI 1.1) states: "The container must fire an event for each enabled bean, interceptor or decorator deployed in a bean archive, before registering the Bean object." However ProcessBeanAttributes is also fired for specialized beans. Specialized beans are not enabled - see "5.1.2. Enabled and disabled beans". -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

12 years, 4 months

2
1
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WELD-1041) InvalidatingSessionDestroysConversationTest.testInvalidatingSessionDestroysConversation() fails

by Jozef Hartinger (Created) (JIRA)

InvalidatingSessionDestroysConversationTest.testInvalidatingSessionDestroysConversation() fails ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: WELD-1041 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WELD-1041 Project: Weld Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Jozef Hartinger Assignee: Jozef Hartinger Fix For: 2.0.0.Alpha1 org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.context.conversation.InvalidatingSessionDestroysConversationTest.testInvalidatingSessionDestroysConversation() fails in CDI TCK 1.0 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

12 years, 4 months

3
2
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WELD-1046) ProcessBeanAttributes fired for producer methods and producer fields has wrong type argument

by Martin Kouba (Created) (JIRA)

ProcessBeanAttributes fired for producer methods and producer fields has wrong type argument -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: WELD-1046 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WELD-1046 Project: Weld Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Martin Kouba Assignee: Jozef Hartinger Fix For: 2.0.0.Alpha1 The spec (CDI 1.1) states: "The event object must be of type javax.enterprise.inject.spi.ProcessBeanAttributes<T> where T is the bean class of the managed bean or session bean, the return type of the producer method, or the type of the producer field." However events fired for producer methods and producer fields are of type javax.enterprise.inject.spi.ProcessBeanAttributes<T> where T is the declaring bean class, not the return type or the type of the field. There is also invalid test in weld test suite - VerifyValuesTest. Observer methods in [VerifyingExtension|https://github.com/weld/core/blob/2.0/tests-arquillian...]: {code} void observeBravo(@Observes ProcessBeanAttributes<BravoProducer> event) { bravo = event.getBeanAttributes(); } void observeCharlie(@Observes ProcessBeanAttributes<CharlieProducer> event) { charlie = event.getBeanAttributes(); } {code} should be replaced with: {code} void observeBravo(@Observes ProcessBeanAttributes<Bravo> event) { bravo = event.getBeanAttributes(); } void observeCharlie(@Observes ProcessBeanAttributes<Charlie> event) { charlie = event.getBeanAttributes(); } {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

12 years, 4 months

2
1
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WELD-1004) Move ObserverMethodImpl.ignore() logic to TypeSafeObserverResolver.matches()

by Jozef Hartinger (Created) (JIRA)

Move ObserverMethodImpl.ignore() logic to TypeSafeObserverResolver.matches() ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: WELD-1004 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WELD-1004 Project: Weld Issue Type: Task Components: Events Affects Versions: 1.1.3.Final Reporter: Jozef Hartinger Assignee: Jozef Hartinger Priority: Minor Fix For: 1.2.0.Beta1, 2.0.0.Alpha1 Currently, ObserverMethodImpl.ignore() contains a check which ensures that container events are fired to extensions only. It is not necessary to perform this check on every event notification. Therefore, move the check to the TypeSafeObserverResolver.matches() method so that it is performed once per observer method resolution. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

12 years, 4 months

2
1
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

weld-issues January 2012