[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDITCK-249?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin...
]
Jozef Hartinger edited comment on CDITCK-249 at 12/7/11 3:15 AM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The fact that BuildingLocal is not a bean type of Office is implied by the fact that
BuildingLocal is not a local interface of Office. See the EJB 3.1 spec section 4.9.2.1
was (Author: jharting):
The fact that BuildingLocal is not a bean type of Office is implied by the fact that
BuildingLocal is not a client view of Office. See the EJB 3.1 spec section 4.9.2.1
Incorrect specialization in
org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.inheritance.specialization.enterprise.EnterpriseBeanSpecializationTest
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: CDITCK-249
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDITCK-249
Project: CDI TCK
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Components: Tests
Affects Versions: 1.0.4.Final
Reporter: Jozef Hartinger
Assignee: Martin Kouba
Priority: Blocker
Fix For: 1.0.5.CR1, 1.1.0.CR1
Office specializes Building
The spec says:
"If X (Office) does not have some bean type of Y (Building), the container
automatically detects the problem and treats it as a definition error."
The Building bean has the type BuildingImpl which the Office bean lacks, thus the
testcase is incorrectly defined.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira