Hi Jason,
+1 for the plan to do time-boxed releases with a three month cadence.
Maybe you could break down the schedule of a given release iteration a bit
further, so e.g. if WF 12 is scheduled for February 28th, what are the mile
stone dates for delivering PRs with new developments in WF itself,
component upgrades, bugfixes etc.? Having a schedule like for instance
OpenJDK has [1] would be helpful, so everyone knows what needs to be done
by when.
Speaking about BV 2.0 and HV 6, we're ready to deliver this (in last week's
Hibernate team meeting we agreed on sending a PR for updating WF this
week). We've done a couple of 6.0.x releases (at 6.0.6 atm.), i.e. it has
been honed nicely and also performance has been improved significantly [2].
So I'd hope we can included this in 12 already?
Thanks,
--Gunnar
[1] 
 Hello Everyone,
 Release Model Changes
 ————————————————————-
 In order to bring new capabilities to the community quicker, we plan to
 move to a more iterative time-boxed approach, starting with WildFly 12 (and
 continuing with 13, 14, etc). By time-boxed, I mean the each release aims
 to have a fixed and reliable delivery window that approximates a calendar
 quarter. Since these time-frames are fixed, it’s important that any given
 feature or improvement not hold up a release. To facilitate this we need to
 make major changes to our development process. Currently development for
 any enhancement is merged in chunks, as it progresses from inception to
 completion. This means to have something worthy of release, we must either
 block for its completion or roll it back. The latter is often difficult,
 since at any given moment there are many features under active development,
 and their respective implementations can become co-dependent. Additionally,
 its common for component dependencies to start off as Alphas and/or Betas,
 and we end up needing to wait for those components to hit Final before we
 can cut the release.
 The solution to this problem is to rely more on topic branches, and only
 merge fully completed work to master. By fully complete, I mean all PRs on
 master should be fully developed, tested, and documented[1]. Additionally
 any updated dependencies must only be against Final/GA components.
 This has a number of advantages:
 A. Master becomes always stable, always releasable. So at any given moment
 we can decided to cut a release[1]
 B. Nightly builds become way more usable, and a great feedback channel (a
 release starts to have less importance)
 C. If a feature takes longer than expected, no big deal, it will be picked
 up in the next cycle[2]
 D. Should anything cause a major regression, not caught in testing it will
 be easier to revert, since the history will be cleaner
 Since in-progress work will need to be based on topic branches, custom
 jobs on 
ci.wildfly.org will need to be relied upon instead of the
 automated CI that happens when you submit a PR (although that’s still
 important and still staying). Additionally if two changes/improvements are
 interrelated, then they will need to either share a topic branch, or find a
 way to construct the work independently (potentially adding and removing a
 temporary construct until both are merged).
 [1] To make it easier to associate documentation with the PR, we are
 looking to move to an asciidoc based solution instead of confluence like we
 utilize today.
 [2] While this is generally the case, there are some activities we can’t
 avoid before releasing, such as ensuring a TCK run has completed.
 [3] An important aspect of C is that iterations have a short enough cycle,
 such that the pressure to make a particular iteration is low enough to
 avoid the urge to try and cram something in, and potentially compromise
 quality (e.g. no docs etc).
 Java EE8
 ————————
 As part of adopting this model, we aim to deliver Java EE8 in incremental
 chunks. Adding support for specs individually in batches. As an example for
 WildFly 12, I propose we target Servlet 4, JSON-B, and CDI. Due to
 unfortunate restrictions in EE certification, we will need to have a
 separate configuration profile or property to enable these additional APIs
 until we complete full EE8 certification.
 Proposed WildFly 12 Goals [Target Release Date = Feb 28, 2018]
 ————————————————————————
 + Adopt new release model
 + Java 9 improvements
 + Servlet 4
 + JSON-B (incorporating Yasoon)
 + CDI 2
 + JSF 2.3
 + Metaspace usage improvements
 + early/initial changes to accommodate the new provisioning effort (easy
 slimming, updates, etc)
 Proposed WildFly 13 Goals (Very Tentative) [May 2018]
 ———————————————————————————-
 + New EE Security Spec
 + Adoption of provisioning
 + JPA 2.2
 + JAX-RS 2.1
 + BV 2.0
 + Agroal inclusion
 Just to highlight that with this new model, that these goals I am
 proposing are not something we would block on, any given item might be
 deferred to the next release if it’s not quite ready. Let me know if you
 have any additional major items you are planning to contribute towards 12.
 Thanks!
 -Jason
 _______________________________________________
 wildfly-dev mailing list
 wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
 
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev