Do you mean Elytron or the Elytron Subsystem?
I believe yes the subsystem does have that dependency but it is only
temporary until PicketBox is removed.
On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 1:51 PM Jean-Francois Denise <jdenise(a)redhat.com>
elytron seems to have a dependency on picketbox for jacc support. Am I
On 05/12/2018 12:04, Darran Lofthouse wrote:
Yes we can remove it entirely ;-)
On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 11:13 PM Carlo de Wolf <cdewolf(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> On 04-12-18 23:15, Brian Stansberry wrote:
> Picketbox layer
>> Because we want at some point to get rid-off this dependency, I am
>> wandering if we should really define a layer for it. Could be that any
>> dependency on it would imply the use of legacy-security layer. Picketbox
>> is implicit when legacy-security layer is provisioned.
> The independent use is the management vault. Using that shouldn't require
> everything in the current p-b module though. And arguably you could say
> that use case means you need the vault tool and thus whatever layer has it.
> (You don't need the vault tool though, not on the server.)
> Can we change the management vault somehow to not need PicketBox at all
> wildfly-dev mailing list