This bug is now fixed in enforce-victims-rule 1.3, which was released to maven central
today. This release also includes a range of performance improvements, including caching,
which significantly improves performance after the first build of a given project. We have
tested it with WildFly 8 on a system where build time without the plugin was 10 minutes.
With the plugin, the first build took 19 minutes, and all subsequent builds took 11
minutes.
Can you please rm -rf ~/.victims/ then update your POM to reference enforce-victims-rule
1.3 and try again?
Thanks
David
Thanks for reporting this issue. We suspect it is actually a bug in
the
victims library, as false negatives or artifacts that do not exist in the DB
should simply pass inspection with no warning or failure. We've fixed the
suspected bug and we're currently working on an updated release, I will
respond to the list once that is complete so you can test.
Thanks
David
> Yes, the build failed. This plugin can be configured to WARNING level
> in the pom, but we then we won't catch the real problems. In the test
> run, I just copied the pom snippet from
>
https://github.com/victims/victims-enforcer
>
> In my case, the failed test project is
>
https://github.com/jberet/jsr352/blob/master/test-apps/postConstruct/pom.xml,
> which has just 1 direct dependency: an internal peer sub-module, which I
> guess is not known to the scanner database. Probably that's why it
> failed? But other similarlly-structured sub-modules passed (e.g.,
>
https://github.com/jberet/jsr352/blob/master/test-apps/propertyInjection/...)
>
> Cheng
>
> On 5/29/13 9:55 AM, Brian Stansberry wrote:
> > On 5/28/13 9:56 PM, Cheng Fang wrote:
> >> The possible false negatives (as David mentioned in his original email)
> >> can also complicate otherwise successful builds. The following error
> >> message might have been caused by gaps in the database, though it's
not
> >> clear which dependency it is complaining about.
> >>
> >> [WARNING] Rule 0: com.redhat.victims.VictimsRule failed with message:
> >> Could not determine vulnerabilities for hash:
> >>
8edd1a0bf70467791ec883b7452c21333e829ab714c83090f8328d8205f159f2669772dd66db01af60debd40402e994be7b08527e8f90211425567b52e6b9472
> >>
> > Does that fail the build, or is the problem limited to noise in the
> > build log?
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> wildfly-dev mailing list
> wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
>