And most of them worked except the one that relies on the default data source.
Arun
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 7:06 AM, Cheng Fang <cfang(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 10/27/13, 4:28 PM, Arun Gupta wrote:
> Ah, that explains why my JSR 236 and 353 tests showed exactly same
> output and JSF tests has the same quirks :-)
>
> Is the Batch RI from IBM ? It requires a database to be setup to store
> all checkpointing data ? Is that stored in memory ?
Batch in WildFly can operate with either in-memory job repository or
jdbc job repository. Currently in-memory one is used and we will be
adding a jdbc one shortly. James already implemented the configurations
in batch subsystem to enable and customize datasource for batch.
Cheng
>
> Is the WebSocket implementation built from scratch ? is it available
> in stand-alone mode ?
>
> Arun
>
> On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 11:20 AM, <ssilvert(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 10/27/2013 1:03 PM, Claudio Miranda wrote:
>>> On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Arun Gupta <arun.gupta(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>> - Are any RI from GlassFish are used in WildFly ?
>>> AFAIK there is JSF-RI (mojarra) in
>>> modules/system/layers/base/com/sun/jsf-impl/
>> To be more precise, it's a fork of Mojarra. Some releases of our
>> version contain fixes that have not yet made it upstream.
>>
>> We're also using the glassfish impl for:
>> EL3
>> JSR 236 - Concurrency Utilities for Java EE
>> JSR 353 - Java API for Processing JSON
>>
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> wildfly-dev mailing list
>> wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
wildfly-dev mailing list
wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev