Re: [wildfly-dev] Is JMX Needed in Core?
On 10/07/14 00:00, Tomaž Cerar wrote:
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 9:35 PM, Brian Stansberry
<brian.stansberry(a)redhat.com <mailto:brian.stansberry@redhat.com>> wrote:
Does logging belong in web then then? Still seems like something that
even the uber-minimalists would want. I ask because it bugs me that we
have two meanings now for "core" -- the old "core" notion that
was the
true core with zero subsystems, and now this new wildfly-core dist,
which has subsystems.
Core *current* comes with following subsystems:
- logging
- jmx (on the way out)
- deployment-scanner
- remoting
- io (because of remoting)
I agree that jmx needs to go out,
deployment scanner needs to stay.
And remoting is needed to make cli & alike work...
In my mind the main thing I think that defines the core is that is
provides you with a base manageable server, Remoting is an integral part
of that.
JMX on the other hand is additional functionality layered on top,
closely related to management but not a requirement of it.
_______________________________________________
wildfly-dev mailing list
wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev