7:35 p.m.
Hi Max, Rob,
few questions for the requirements.
* Does the underlying software need to be identified? I.e. if it's
SOA, should the file also say it's EAP for the tools which do not
know SOA? E.g.
o software.base = EAP
o software.layer = SOA
o software.name = JBoss SOA-Platform
* Should a timestamp be included? E.g. to differentiate between
release candidates which all have ".GA"
* Do you care about the format - as long it's well-known documented
standard? I'm considering either .properties or .xml. ISO/IEC
19770-2 was suggested but that seems to be overkill and doesn't even
match our needs.
* What everything do you expect to be in the file? SW identification
and version but:
o ID vs. name - do you want just "eap" or do you expect to have
something to present to the user directly, i.e. some "JBoss
Enterprise Application Platform" ?
o AS vs. EAP - do you need the boolean info whether it is a
supported product?
That's all for now,
looking forward to getting your reply.
Ondra
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [wildfly-dev] PR-5551/5552 - version-base.txt
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 00:48:45 +0100
From: Ondrej Zizka <ozizka(a)redhat.com>
To: wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>, Max
Rydahl Andersen <manderse(a)redhat.com>, Rob Stryker
<rstryker(a)redhat.com>, Paul Gier <pgier(a)redhat.com>, Knutsen, Aslak
<aknutsen(a)redhat.com>
Added Paul Gier and Aslak to CC - could you guys please share your opinions.
Let's discuss this before we get to some code freeze and it's late / no
time to solve this.
Is the arrangement (described in the jira comments) a viable way to
statically identify (without launching) a server / product / layers added?
Thanks,
Ondra
On 2.12.2013 13:12, Ondrej Zizka wrote:
Hi all,
there's a request for something for static identification of the server
in a directory. This comes from JBDS and prehaps other tools (installer,
upgrader, ...)
The jira is https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-2426
The discussion on that jira staled, so I created these
https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly/pull/5551
https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly/pull/5552
(It's the same thing done in 2 ways.)
I suggest to keep the discussion in that jira WFLY-2426 .
Is this solution (as described there) acceptable? Even for layered
stuff? Max + Rob in the CC.
Thanks,
Ondra
_______________________________________________
wildfly-dev mailing list
wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
_______________________________________________
wildfly-dev mailing list
wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev