On 08/01/14 13:59, Arun Gupta wrote:
I would agree with Heiko, Curl is often used by admins in their
shell
scripts. This makes their scripts portable.
Is there an overhead to supporting curl ?
Not necessarily, new features are being discussed regarding
authentication at this point I am just trying to confirm if my
perception that users are using tools like curl is actually true ;-)
Arun
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 4:35 AM, Darran Lofthouse
<darran.lofthouse(a)jboss.com> wrote:
> Hello Ladislav,
>
> No 'reasoning' as such at this point, and no decisions taken yet. We
> are currently discussing the future of domain management especially over
> HTTP and I need to understand how important tools like this are.
>
> We originally had support for standard HTTP clients on the requirements
> list, just need to validate now if it was a valid requirement ;-)
>
> Regards,
> Darran Lofthouse.
>
>
> On 08/01/14 11:58, Ladislav Thon wrote:
>>> Just starting to plan some upstream changes for WildFly and just wanted
>>> to gauge how much simple http tools like curl are in use?
>>>
>>> If we were to completely disable their use would it cause problems?
>>
>> That would be a blocker regression for me :-)
>>
>> Could you share what's the reasoning behind this? I use curl basically for
everything that supports HTTP interaction (unless I build a specialized tool, but even
then, I use curl for debugging the tool. It's immensely useful and I would hate losing
it).
>>
>> LT
>>
> _______________________________________________
> wildfly-dev mailing list
> wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev