[wildfly-dev] Re: Applying to Commonhaus

There are the https://github.com/jbossws/ JBoss Web Services projects that likely make sense to move with WildFly as well. Those projects are only used within WildFly. If we could move those over too that would be great!

James R. Perkins Principal Software Engineer Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com/> <https://www.redhat.com/> On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 2:46 PM Brian Stansberry <bstansbe(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > (project leads -- please be sure to read the 'If you maintain' part > below.) > I'd like to take the next step in transitioning the WildFly project to a > vendor-neutral foundation by applying to Commonhaus. We've been talking > about this for quite a while, gathering input, and the consensus I've seen > has been that Commonhaus is the best option. I think Commonhaus’ guiding > principles around honoring project and community identity and offering > guidance instead of mandates, with its “community-first” governance model, > make it the best for WildFly. > > The process of applying is covered at > https://github.com/commonhaus/foundation/discussions/new?category=joining.... > I'm hoping to initiate a discussion by the end of this week. That entails > filling out the issue template linked above and sending up a PR with the > necessary information. > > Note that I'll be applying for the 'WildFly' project, which is somewhat > nebulously defined. A simplistic, and incomplete boundary is that it covers > the non-archived projects hosted in the 'wildfly' GitHub organization. It > will also cover non-archived projects in the 'wildfly-extras' GitHub org, > except, perhaps: > > creaper > sunstone > wildfly-camel > wildfly-camel-book > wildfly-camel-examples > > It can cover those as well, but I want to check with the respective > project maintainers that that's what they want. > > It will also cover a few repos in the 'jboss' and 'jbossas' Github orgs > that really should be moved to the 'wildfly' org. > > If you maintain a project that is not in one of the categories above but > that you believe fits into WildFly project governance, or could fit into a > sensibly modified WildFly governance, and you'd like it to be considered > part of this application, please let me know. If you want to discuss it > here, that's fine. > > Some (not definitive) considerations as to whether a project 'fits' > > * Is it somehow 'WildFly' branded, or perhaps 'JBoss' branded as a > leftover from 'JBoss AS'? > * How much is it used outside of the various WildFly deliverables? > > Thanks! > > Best regards, > > -- > Brian Stansberry > Principal Architect, Red Hat JBoss EAP > WildFly Project Lead > He/Him/His > _______________________________________________ > wildfly-dev mailing list -- wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > To unsubscribe send an email to wildfly-dev-leave(a)lists.jboss.org > Privacy Statement: https://www.redhat.com/en/about/privacy-policy > List Archives: > https://lists.jboss.org/archives/list/wildfly-dev@lists.jboss.org/message... > _______________________________________________ wildfly-dev mailing list -- wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org To unsubscribe send an email to wildfly-dev-leave(a)lists.jboss.org Privacy Statement: https://www.redhat.com/en/about/privacy-policy List Archives: https://lists.jboss.org/archives/list/wildfly-dev@lists.jboss.org/message...