3:54 p.m.
If we don't do that we should :)
The slightly sad thing is thy conceptually it makes sense for CDI to start before JPA.
On 8 juin 2013, at 23:48, Stuart Douglas <stuart.w.douglas(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I think the only real way to solve this is to pass in a BM proxy to
JPA, that delegates to the real BM once it becomes available. As long as JPA does not
attempt to use the BM during startup this should be fine.
Stuart
On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 2:20 AM, Scott Marlow <smarlow(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> For application deployments that use ClassFileTransformer to
> enhance/rewrite entity classes, we start the persistence unit service
> (PersistenceProvider.createContainerEntityManagerFactory()) during the
> Phase.FIRST_MODULE_USE (before any application classes have been loaded).
>
> For application deployments that have an explicit CDI Bean Manager,
> there is a beans.xml that means the ClassFileTransformer will not work,
> since the CDI Bean Manager will scan all of the application classes
> (loading them), before the persistence unit service is started (so that
> the persistence provider can use CDI in entity listeners).
>
> The same is also true for implicit CDI Bean manager support [1], expect
> all application deployments that contain an ejb3 module, will be wired
> for CDI (meaning JPA ClassFileTransformer support will work even less).
>
> I raised this on the JPA 2.1 EG [2] in response to an earlier
> discussion, about switching to a two phase approach to address problems
> like this (didn't discuss CDI implicit support then but am raising that
> now).
>
> [3] talks about why we don't create the CDI bean managers before the
> Install phase (would cause all application classes to be read which
> breaks JPA ClassFileTransformer use).
>
> [4] is for adding implicit CDI support but is blocked currently by [5].
>
> We can add persistence unit flags (jboss.as.jpa.classtransformer=false)
> for disabling JPA ClassFileTransformer support as a workaround but that
> doesn't help enough since many deployments will have implicit CDI
> support enabled (since they contain EJB modules). We could add a way to
> disable implicit CDI support as another workaround for deployments that
> want to use ClassFileTransformer.
>
> I'm not yet seeing a proper fix for this. Anyone else?
>
> Scott
>
> [1] http://docs.jboss.org/cdi/spec/1.1/cdi-spec.html#bean_archive
> [2]
> https://java.net/projects/jpa-spec/lists/jsr338-experts/archive/2013-06/m...
> [3] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-1322
> [4] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-476
> [5] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-1463
> _______________________________________________
> wildfly-dev mailing list
> wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
_______________________________________________
wildfly-dev mailing list
wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev