On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 9:41 AM, Brian Stansberry
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 9:25 AM, David Lloyd
> I guess I wasn't too clear. I didn't mean to say there was some other
> way to detect the type. I meant to say that the type determination
> should be done *before* the overridden runtime name is applied, not
I'm confused now. :)
Isn't this entire thread about the ability to use the "runtime-name"
attribute to override the actual file name of the JAR? I'm simply
stating that the type probably should be based on the name of the
content file, not the runtime-name.