probably having org.wildfly.extension.<>
that would too much :)
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 4:07 PM, David M. Lloyd <david.lloyd(a)redhat.com>wrote:
because there will be wildfly stuff which isn't subsystems and which
might have names that conflict. I'd even suggest
"org.wildfly.as.subsystem..." but that might be too much.
On 04/29/2013 08:58 AM, Tomaž Cerar wrote:
> What should be package name for new stuff being added to WildFly?
> org.wildfly.as <http://org.wildfly.as>.<subsystem-name>
> or something else?
> I would go for org.wildfly.<subsystem-name>
> this mostly applies to new subsystems and as we agreed we won't rename
> packages for existing code until it break compatibility.
> wildfly-dev mailing list
wildfly-dev mailing list