Yes we can remove it entirely ;-)
On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 11:13 PM Carlo de Wolf <cdewolf(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 04-12-18 23:15, Brian Stansberry wrote:
> Because we want at some point to get rid-off this dependency, I am
> wandering if we should really define a layer for it. Could be that any
> dependency on it would imply the use of legacy-security layer. Picketbox
> is implicit when legacy-security layer is provisioned.
The independent use is the management vault. Using that shouldn't require
everything in the current p-b module though. And arguably you could say
that use case means you need the vault tool and thus whatever layer has it.
(You don't need the vault tool though, not on the server.)
Can we change the management vault somehow to not need PicketBox at all
wildfly-dev mailing list