Re: [wildfly-dev] Trimming console size
we been proposing a separate delivery channel, yes. The main motivation was to provide
beta streams and updates independent of the WF release cycle. But that doesn't mean
shipping WF downloads w/o a console. IMO this should stay.
I hope that answers your question.
/Heiko
On 26 Feb 2014, at 13:27, Stan Silvert <ssilvert(a)redhat.com> wrote:
I understood that you and Herald were the ones driving this. Is your
+1 just for the "optional" part or do you no longer think that having the
console as an independent downloadable app is a good idea?
>
> On 26 Feb 2014, at 04:21, Bill Burke <bburke(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> I hope this separation of the console from Wildfly is optional. Its a
>> much bigger advantage to be able to download one distro, unzip, and run,
>> specifically for development. Makes it simple for 1st time users. For
>> development, nobody cares if there's an extra 30M that's part of the
>> distro.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> wildfly-dev mailing list
> wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 8.1 KB)