Not sure if you meant to drop the list. But then I agree provided searching based on the ID and finding a solution written for a JBoss Web problem has the same meaning and solution within Undertow then there should be no problem re-using the ID and actually that probably should be something we do to allow an existing solution to be re-used. Regards, Darran Lofthouse. On 04/07/13 11:18, Tomaž Cerar wrote: > Yes where they are reused they mean exactly same thing. > We didn't reused all messages but just in integration places that are > the same as with jbossweb. > undertow subsystem also has bunch of extra messages that are unique to it > > > On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Darran Lofthouse > <darran.lofthouse(a)jboss.com <mailto:darran.lofthouse@**jboss.com<darran.lofthouse@jboss.com>>> > wrote: > > On 03/07/13 17:22, Tomaž Cerar wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 6:04 PM, Darran Lofthouse > <darran.lofthouse(a)jboss.com <mailto:darran.lofthouse@**jboss.com<darran.lofthouse@jboss.com> > > > <mailto:darran.lofthouse@__jbo**ss.com <http://jboss.com> > > <mailto:darran.lofthouse@**jboss.com <darran.lofthouse(a)jboss.com&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; > wrote: > > Are they reporting the same problem and do they have the > same solution? > > They are exactly the same, same id and msg.... > > > That wasn't my question ;-) > > Do they have the same meaning and same solution? > > Or if someone searches based on these IDs is it going to mean > something different when it applies to Undertow? > > >