On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>
wrote:
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> The health endpoint is protected by Keycloak, you can see here the
> different patterns on how the endpoints are protected
>
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/blob/master/serve...
>
> I'd not change that.
> Here also a sample on how you could call this endpoint from a third party
> app/lib:
>
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/blob/master/node....
>
> Here we create a Push Application but you could adapt it easily to ping
> the health endpoint.
>
the readme contains some hints on the required Keycloak update for that
Actually, isnt it lame the UI does not show the info - somewhere ?
You mean the REST doc ?
>
> Sebi
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 9:26 AM, Fischelmayer Michael <
> Michael.Fischelmayer(a)apa.at> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>>
>> How is the Health Status Enpoint protected?
>>
>>
https://SERVER:PORT/CONTEXT/rest/sys/info/health/
>>
>>
>>
>> I get an 401 but I can’t find the protection method in the rest docu.
>>
>>
>>
https://aerogear.org/docs/specs/aerogear-unifiedpush-rest/index.html#-200...
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks and Regards
>> Michael
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Aerogear-users mailing list
>> Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Aerogear-users mailing list
> Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
Aerogear-users mailing list
Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users