Re: [Aerogear-users] [aerogear-dev] UPS Device Registration Endpoints

Thanks for the info guys. Also i just released the 0.1.0 version of this https://www.npmjs.com/package/unifiedpush-registration-client a client for doing device registration. Currently implemented is register and unregister. i'm working on getting the "importer" working for the next release. On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 12:50 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: > > > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 10:10 PM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc(a)gmail.com&gt; > wrote: > >> >> >> Envoyé de mon iPhone >> >> Le 27 mai 2016 à 21:56, Luke Holmquist <lholmqui(a)redhat.com&gt; a écrit : >> >> thats right folks, i'm asking this question on a Friday before a Holiday >> weekend(US) at 3:52(est) >> >> >> i've started to implement the Device registration endpoints in node and >> was just wondering what the id is here in this header >> >> >> -v -H "Accept: application/json" -H "Content-type: application/json" -H "aerogear-push-id: someid" >> >> >> is it something specific, or just a random number/alpha-numeric thingy >> >> >> here is the doc link for reference: >> https://aerogear.org/docs/specs/aerogear-unifiedpush-rest/#246535932 >> >> Let's wait for Matzew to confirm but I think you can ignore it. Looks >> like a left over from our first analytics implementation , we use now a >> separate endpoint (the PUT) and pass this ID as a path parameter. >> We probably need to clean up the javadoc >> > > correct, doc error. > > the thing is only relevant here: > > https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/blob/252c3a979cf0... > > > >> >> >> >> I've also decided to create this as a separate module instead of >> including it in the node admin client here: >> https://github.com/bucharest-gold/unifiedpush-admin-client >> mostly becuase these registration endpoints don't needed to be KC >> authenticated. >> >> even if they were KC managed, they would be different (E.g. just > bearer-only), since there is no relationship to the actual mgmt of the > server. > > +1 on separating these two things > > -M > > > >> and they could also be used on a IOT device or something that runs >> node that has webpush/simplePush or some new crazy protocol. >> >> Make sense , I like that >> >> >> >> -Luke >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Aerogear-users mailing list >> Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Aerogear-users mailing list >> Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users >> >> > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev