[JBoss JIRA] Created: (SEAMFORGE-231) Undo features in Seam Forge
by Ian Hands (JIRA)
Undo features in Seam Forge
---------------------------
Key: SEAMFORGE-231
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SEAMFORGE-231
Project: Seam Forge
Issue Type: Feature Request
Components: Brainstorming
Affects Versions: 1.0.0.Alpha4
Environment: All
Reporter: Ian Hands
Priority: Minor
Forge should support undo/redo of changes on the file system. Use of git would rock here.
Particularly cases where forge is introduced to an existing project could be nasty.
If git is used care could be taken to integrate with projects that are already using git as a version control mechanism.
ex:
I see you are already using git, what branch should Forge use when modifying files?
1 - SeamForgeScratch
* - define your own
Commit changes to the tmp branch and then optionally merge with master.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
13 years, 5 months
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (SEAMFORGE-229) Invoking commands using minus sign seems to break "run" plugin
by Lincoln Baxter III (JIRA)
Invoking commands using minus sign seems to break "run" plugin
--------------------------------------------------------------
Key: SEAMFORGE-229
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SEAMFORGE-229
Project: Seam Forge
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Shell
Affects Versions: 1.0.0.Alpha4
Reporter: Lincoln Baxter III
{code}
[no project] JAX $
[no project] JAX $ run forge-conftrack-demo.fsh
***ERROR*** Exception encountered: [Error: illegal function name or use of reserved word]
[Near : {... -demo_fsh_1064826090() {currentStep = 1;v = SHELL. ....}]
^
[Line: 1, Column: 39] (type "set VERBOSE true" to enable stack traces)
[no project] JAX $ run demo.fsh
? Start at which step?
{code}
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
13 years, 5 months
extracting generic scaffolding things?
by Ronald van Kuijk
All,
I'm currently implementing primefaces scaffolding and come to the conclusion
that this does not belong in the metawidget plugin since there is no
relation from primefaces to metawidget (There is the other way around, like
with primefaces but that is a different issue).
Now there is a lot of overlap with regard to e.g. default templates, page
utils etc... All that can be generic and does not need to be duplicated or
something, So I was thinking about a more generic facet where some of these
things can take place. Is this something you think is interesting for now or
should I duplicate things for now?
Cheers,
Ronald
13 years, 5 months