hasFacet return false after instalation in Forge test
by Rafael Pestano
Hi guys,
I have a simple test which runs the setup command and then verifies if the
facet was installed:
@Test
public void shouldGenerateSwaggerResources() throws Exception {
Result result = shellTest.execute("swagger-setup", 25, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
Assert.assertThat(result, not(instanceOf(Failed.class)));
Assert.assertThat(result.getMessage(), is(equalTo("Swagger setup
completed successfully!")));
Assert.assertTrue(project.hasFacet(SwaggerFacet.class));
the problem is that the assertion in returning false and test is failing.
Note that the setup command runs with success and also I can confirm the
facet is installed when I run the plugin on the IDE.
here's the setup command:
@Override
public Result execute(UIExecutionContext context) throws Exception {
Project project = getSelectedProject(context);
boolean execute = true;
if (project.hasFacet(SwaggerFacet.class) &&
project.getFacet(SwaggerFacet.class).isInstalled()) {
execute = context.getPrompt().promptBoolean("Swagger plugin is
already installed, override it?");
}
if (execute) {
swaggerConfiguration.setResourcesDir(resourcesDir.getValue());
SwaggerFacet facet = facetFactory.create(project, SwaggerFacet.class);
facet.setConfiguration(swaggerConfiguration);
facetFactory.install(project, facet);
copySwaggerUIResources(facet);
return Results.success("Swagger setup completed successfully!");
} else {
return Results.success();
}
}
When I debug the test I can see the SwaggerFacet#isInstalled returns true
after setup command.
The code can be found here: https://github.com/rmpestano/swagger-addon
Any help is appreciated.
--
Att,
Rafael M. Pestano
Desenvolvedor Java Cia. de Processamento de Dados do Rio Grande do Sul
http://rpestano.wordpress.com/
@realpestano
7 years, 8 months
Issues with shell tests in Arquillian Addon
by Bartosz Majsak
Hi,
in Forge Arquillian Addon we are struggling with integration tests executed
using `org.jboss.forge.addon.shell.test.ShellTest`. We've noticed that
particular tests are "randomly" failing every n-th execution. Interestingly
enough it’s almost always [`AddArquillianAlgeronPublisherTest`](
https://github.com/forge/addon-arquillian/blob/e6b6e905ec86ceef1c1a72862d...)
hanging on 2nd or 3rd command. Not sure what makes it so special, but at
least it's a starting point for further investigation. Without a serious
scientific method I can conclude it's almost 5/10 runs of the full build.
We spent some time investigating without that much of luck, but what we
have observed is that
```java
public boolean isEnabled(UIContext context) {
Boolean parent = super.isEnabled(context);
if (parent) {
return getSelectedProject(context).hasFacet(AlgeronConsumer.class);
}
return parent;
}
```
is sometimes not recognizing that `parent` is a project. This might a be
lead. Above snippet comes from [`AbstractAlgeronPublisherCommand`](
https://github.com/forge/addon-arquillian/blob/e6b6e905ec86ceef1c1a72862d...
).
Moreover we are explictly installing all the required facets, as we thought
that could be the root cause.
But it seems it's not the problem. Or maybe we are doing something wrong
here as well?
Any hints would be more than welcome :) This is really bothering us at the
moment :\
Cheers,
Bartosz.
7 years, 9 months
Re: [forge-dev] Multitenancy for Forge as a Service
by George Gastaldi
Hey Pete,
The Obsidia Forge addon uses ProjectFactory.createTempProject (which in
turn uses File.newTempFile) to create a temporary project.
Files.delete is called once the flow is over (in a finally block)
Em 4 de fev de 2017 12:03, "Pete Muir" <pmuir(a)redhat.com> escreveu:
On Wednesday, 1 February 2017, Max Rydahl Andersen <manderse(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
>
> > Hey Andrew,
> >
> > Yes, this is a really important question, and it's something that I
> > believe
> > that the Forge architecture supports out-of-the-box. Every interaction
> > with
> > the UI API (the Forge commands, per say) is stored in a request-scoped
> > UIContext[1] object that is initialized when a command is invoked and
> > destroyed when the command finishes executing. That means that you can
> > execute multiple concurrent commands in a single Forge instance and
> > they
> > will not affect each other.
>
> Excellent.
>
My understanding of the flow then is something like this:
1) The user works through one or more screens, inputting fields that
describe what they want
2) The web UI creates Forge commands from this, batching them all up to
send in a single request to the server
3) On receiving commands the server executes them in Forge, generates a
response, and then cleans up any resources generated on the server side
In other words, Forge as a Service is not stateful in anyway, so each time
you send a request, Forge must rebuild the project context.
If so, this sounds good, as IIRC Forge can build project contexts
relatively quickly.
A couple of things to follow up on in this area:
1) How confident are you with the cleanup step - principally I'm wondering
if you ensure a cleanup by using some sort of temporary file system whilst
the request is in progress and then removing it once the request completes?
Note that our backup thought here was just to cycle the container running
Forge regularly so that we don't run risk running out of disk space, so
this is not overly critical.
2) Actually this is related - how are you isolating projects on the server
side, particularly with disk?
>
> > When it comes to security, as a good practice, it is important to
> > restrict
> > the commands that the exposed REST service can execute.
> > That's why in the Obsidian backend[2] we only expose a REST
> > endpoint[3]
> > consuming the Forge API to execute a limited number of commands (more
> > specifically, the ones exposed by the obsidian-addon[4])
>
Very sensible :-)
> >
> > Last but not least, as the Forge Online app is just a PoC illustrating
> > how
> > Forge can work in a web environment, it does not impose restrictions
> > to the
> > supported commands, therefore it shouldn't be a web app to be used in
> > production.
>
We wouldn't want to use this app directly anyway...
>
> Since we need something for production I would be curious to know what
> you feel are missing ?
>
> > PS: It would be nice to ping the Fabric8 team for this matter as they
> > are
> > already using Forge as their project generator solution for a long
> > time now.
>
> In case you missed it - fabric8 team is now part of devtools and
> devtools are fabric8 :)
>
> We'll get James et.al. involved (they are in f2f meetings this week),
> but as I understood
> Fabric8 have a fork of the PoC adjusted to handle some more complex
> workflows they were
> exploring. Things they would like to get merged back as I understand it.
>
> That said - to outline the items we were discussing about forge as a
> SaaS:
>
> Main reason we need it in first place is that Forge is *massive*, takes
> up a lot of
> resources - even more than Eclipse Che; thus we are very interested in
> being able to run
> Forge without having one instance per user.
>
> In that we had some questions and concerns in addition to the ones
> above:
>
> A) can forge run without access to download updates etc. from maven and
> similar ?
> i.e. can we lock updates down and ensure it and its execution cannot
> be altered
> just because someone updated a plugin.
> (We discussed firewalling it completely to be sure :)
>
> B) Is there a way to ensure that secrets like GitHub auth keys and
> others are
> not exposed to users nor in logs ?
>
> C) Any expectations/ideas on how we would integrate obsidian generators
> with
> fabric8 ?
> Two options we considered:
> 1) call out to separate hosted obsidian-toaster and run the
> risk of
> exposing secrets on wire.
> 2) run obsidian-toaster or a copy of it inside fabric8 online so
> we don't expose any secrets.
>
> Pete and others might have more, but above are the ones I wrote down
> while being on bluejeans to the conversations.
>
> > I hope this helps. Looking forward to this list of requirements and
> > happy
> > to discuss about this anytime.
> >
> > [1] -
> > https://github.com/forge/core/tree/master/ui#uicommand-
> execution-lifecycle
> > [2] - https://github.com/obsidian-toaster/generator-backend
> > [3] -
> > https://github.com/obsidian-toaster/generator-backend/
> blob/master/src/main/java/org/obsidiantoaster/generator/
> rest/ObsidianResource.java
> > [4] - https://github.com/obsidian-toaster/obsidian-addon
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> > *George Gastaldi*
> >
> > https://onename.com/gastaldi
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 9:27 PM, Andrew Lee Rubinger <alr(a)redhat.com
> <javascript:;>>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi, all:
> >>
> >> We have some requests coming down the pike from the Developer Group
> >> with
> >> regards to running Forge as a Service (which is great!).
> >>
> >> Additionally, I'm suspecting this will soon be very important for us
> >> as
> >> well, as we continue to build out what's currently known as the
> >> "Obsidian
> >> Generator", using Forge as a backend.
> >>
> >> I'm hoping the Forge team will kindly advise as to our preparedness
> >> for
> >> running Forge in a multitenant environment. Concerns may include
> >> resource
> >> consumption (not running an instance-per-user), security, etc. Have
> >> we yet
> >> broached this subject specifically in the prototypes I've seen thus
> >> far
> >> using Forge Online?
> >>
> >> I've requested of the Developer Group a list of requirements they've
> >> devised; will send those along here when I have them. In the
> >> meantime,
> >> mind describing where we currently stand?
> >>
> >> S,
> >> ALR
> >>
> >> --
> >> Red Hat Developer Group Architecture
> >> @ALRubinger
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> forge-dev mailing list
> >> forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <javascript:;>
> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > forge-dev mailing list
> > forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <javascript:;>
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>
>
> /max
> http://about.me/maxandersen
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <javascript:;>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>
_______________________________________________
forge-dev mailing list
forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
7 years, 9 months
Multitenancy for Forge as a Service
by Andrew Lee Rubinger
Hi, all:
We have some requests coming down the pike from the Developer Group with
regards to running Forge as a Service (which is great!).
Additionally, I'm suspecting this will soon be very important for us as
well, as we continue to build out what's currently known as the "Obsidian
Generator", using Forge as a backend.
I'm hoping the Forge team will kindly advise as to our preparedness for
running Forge in a multitenant environment. Concerns may include resource
consumption (not running an instance-per-user), security, etc. Have we yet
broached this subject specifically in the prototypes I've seen thus far
using Forge Online?
I've requested of the Developer Group a list of requirements they've
devised; will send those along here when I have them. In the meantime,
mind describing where we currently stand?
S,
ALR
--
Red Hat Developer Group Architecture
@ALRubinger
7 years, 9 months
