Hi!
I just pushed the new REST plugin to master. JAX-RS can now be configured by either the
web.xml like before, or an Application class.
It's now also using the TreeVisiting API, but only if it finds that configuration is
missing or is invalid. So if the configuration is not in sync because of refactoring for
example, the plugin will notice this and fix it's configuration by scanning the
project's classes. As long as the configuration is still correct, it will not rescan
classes. By using the configuration API as a cache I hope the performance penalty of
scanning classes will be minimized. We still should test this better on large projects
however, but that's out of the scope of this issue.
Paul
On Mar 9, 2012, at 19:43 , Lincoln Baxter, III wrote:
Hey Paul,
How is this coming along? I only ask because it came up from the tools team that Forge
has trouble detecting apps using the REST @Application() annotation.
I hope all is well!
~Lincoln
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III <lincolnbaxter(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Yep! Glad to be back, though :)
I think it might be a good idea to watch the performance of this operation, though. It
could get expensive for large projects, so it might be a good idea to only do this check
when necessary, and store the result in forge project scoped config. We are becoming an
IDE :)
Will be complicated I think, or slow...
~Lincoln
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Paul Bakker <paul.bakker(a)luminis.eu> wrote:
Hi! Had a good time?
The new API looks really good to use here, didn't know we could do that… I wasn't
too happy with using configuration for this, because it will break on refactoring, so
it's much better is we can do it this way. I will look into it to use it.
Paul
On Feb 27, 2012, at 17:09 , Lincoln Baxter, III wrote:
> Hey Paul!
>
> Back from Vaca.
>
> My first thought here is that this is excellent use of the Configuration API, but I
think currently the way this is written, it depends on the Configuration in order to
recognize the fact that there is an application class serving as a REST activator?
>
> We could use the JavaParser TreeVisiting API that was just introduced, in order to
search project sources and make this determination.
>
>
https://github.com/forge/core/blob/master/shell-api/src/main/java/org/jbo...
>
> Thoughts?
> ~Lincoln
>
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Paul Bakker <paul.bakker(a)luminis.eu> wrote:
> Hi Lincoln,
>
> I made some progress on refactoring the rest stuff, plus I added the option to use an
Application class instead of web.xml. Because it changed quite a lot and this is the first
time we use the idea of having "nested" facets it would probably be good if you
review before I merge to master.
>
>
https://github.com/forge/core/commit/ec0275a821c6bb3ccf690b55d66816073ba0...
>
> Let me know what you think :-)
>
> Paul
>
>
>
> --
> Lincoln Baxter, III
>
http://ocpsoft.com
>
http://scrumshark.com
> "Keep it Simple"
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
_______________________________________________
forge-dev mailing list
forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
--
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.com
http://scrumshark.com
"Keep it Simple"
--
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.com
http://scrumshark.com
"Keep it Simple"
_______________________________________________
forge-dev mailing list
forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev