+1 !
way to go Rafael !
Em 11/07/2012, às 09:00, Rafael Benevides <benevides(a)redhat.com> escreveu:
Yesterday I started to work on this new yaml format and I tried to
capture all requirements that was discussed in this Thread. The result was the following
attached uml diagram.
I think that's the better way to try comprehending what is needed and what will be
covered. Today (or maybe tomorrow) I'll convert this idea to an example yaml file that
is the representation of the diagram.
The closest of the idea is something like similar to:
bom: &jboss-with-x
name: JBoss With X
description: lorem ipsum
otherProperties: otherValues
availableVersions:
- 1.0.0.Final
- 1.0.1.CR1
bom: &jboss-with-y
name: JBoss With Y
description: lorem ipsum
otherProperties: otherValues
availableVersions:
- 1.0.0.Final
- 1.0.1.CR1
runtime: &jbosseap6
version: 6.0
type: EAP
boms:
- *jboss-with-x
- *jboss-with-y
recommendedBOM: *jboss-with-x
Em 03-07-2012 13:01, Rafael Benevides escreveu:
>
>
> Em 03-07-2012 12:53, James Perkins escreveu:
>>
>>> We could do that as well.
>>>
>>> 7.0.1.Final:
>>> properties:
>>> arguments: -logmodule
>>> cli: not-available
>> I like this approach.
> I like this approach either!
<Class Diagram.png>
_______________________________________________
forge-dev mailing list
forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev