Oh sweet, yeah @Veto worked. Thanks!
Regards,
Richard.
On 18/11/2011 7:45 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III wrote:
Hmmm. Is it the scanning you need to prevent, or will the @Veto or
@Requires annotations suffice?
~Lincoln
PS. Haven't had a chance to sit down and work on your issues yet, really sorry if
this is holding you up. I just haven't had a chance to breathe this week!
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Richard Kennard <richard(a)kennardconsulting.com
<mailto:richard@kennardconsulting.com>> wrote:
Hi guys,
I've hit a problem related to an interaction of Arquillian, Weld and Metawidget.
It could probably be fixed in any one of those, and I will endaveour to
fix it in Metawidget in the future, but for now I need a workaround.
Basically, I need to exclude 'org.jboss.forge.scaffold.faces.metawidget' from
the Weld scanning during Arquillian unit testing. Where should I do that? I
tried modifying /forge/scaffold-faces/src/main/resources/META-INF/beans.xml but I
think that's the beans.xml that gets built into the app that Forge
generates, *not* the beans.xml that controls the Arquillian unit testing?
Regards,
Richard.
_______________________________________________
forge-dev mailing list
forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:forge-dev@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
--
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.com
http://scrumshark.com
"Keep it Simple"
_______________________________________________
forge-dev mailing list
forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev