Hey Paul,
How is this coming along? I only ask because it came up from the tools team
that Forge has trouble detecting apps using the REST @Application()
annotation.
I hope all is well!
~Lincoln
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III <
lincolnbaxter(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Yep! Glad to be back, though :)
I think it might be a good idea to watch the performance of this
operation, though. It could get expensive for large projects, so it might
be a good idea to only do this check when necessary, and store the result
in forge project scoped config. We are becoming an IDE :)
Will be complicated I think, or slow...
~Lincoln
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Paul Bakker <paul.bakker(a)luminis.eu>wrote:
> Hi! Had a good time?
> The new API looks really good to use here, didn't know we could do that…
> I wasn't too happy with using configuration for this, because it will break
> on refactoring, so it's much better is we can do it this way. I will look
> into it to use it.
>
> Paul
>
>
>
> On Feb 27, 2012, at 17:09 , Lincoln Baxter, III wrote:
>
> Hey Paul!
>
> Back from Vaca.
>
> My first thought here is that this is excellent use of the Configuration
> API, but I think currently the way this is written, it depends on the
> Configuration in order to recognize the fact that there is an application
> class serving as a REST activator?
>
> We could use the JavaParser TreeVisiting API that was just introduced, in
> order to search project sources and make this determination.
>
>
>
https://github.com/forge/core/blob/master/shell-api/src/main/java/org/jbo...
>
> Thoughts?
> ~Lincoln
>
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Paul Bakker <paul.bakker(a)luminis.eu>wrote:
>
>> Hi Lincoln,
>>
>> I made some progress on refactoring the rest stuff, plus I added the
>> option to use an Application class instead of web.xml. Because it changed
>> quite a lot and this is the first time we use the idea of having
"nested"
>> facets it would probably be good if you review before I merge to master.
>>
>>
>>
https://github.com/forge/core/commit/ec0275a821c6bb3ccf690b55d66816073ba0...
>>
>> Let me know what you think :-)
>>
>> Paul
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Lincoln Baxter, III
>
http://ocpsoft.com
>
http://scrumshark.com
> "Keep it Simple"
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>
>
--
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.com
http://scrumshark.com
"Keep it Simple"