Re: [forge-dev] arquillian powered forge deployer

I think we're talking about two different things here 1) Deploying to AS7 using Shrinkwrap/Arquillian instead of file copies. 2) Downloading and setting up the container (the issue Lincoln linked to). But anyway, I agree we should do this. I will pick this up. Paul On Sep 19, 2011, at 10:07 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III wrote: Paul, Does this look like a good starting point? Is this what you were thinking? ~Lincoln On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Aslak Knutsen <aslak(a)4fs.no&gt; wrote: > > https://github.com/arquillian/arquillian-maven/blob/master/plugin/src/mai... > > :) > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 8:54 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III > <lincolnbaxter(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > > Yes, we need this. I believe Paul is working on this. Copied forge-dev. > > > > https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SEAMFORGE-284 > > > > Where do we get started? > > > > ~Lincoln > > > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen(a)gmail.com&gt; > wrote: > >> > >> I think its very important to switch forge over to the arquillian > >> container module to handle container life cycle and deploy commands in > a > >> generic way, rather than the current as7 command. Could you guys catch > up so > >> lincoln can get the info he needs about the container apis to get this > >> kickef off? This is a great example of using what we have across > projects > >> (to follow up on a theme from the f2f). > >> > >> - Dan Allen > >> > >> Sent from my Android-powered phone: > >> An open platform for carriers, consumers and developers > > > > > > -- > > Lincoln Baxter, III > > http://ocpsoft.com > > http://scrumshark.com > > "Keep it Simple" > > > -- Lincoln Baxter, III http://ocpsoft.com http://scrumshark.com "Keep it Simple"