Re: [forge-dev] arquillian powered forge deployer

On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 16:23, Paul Bakker <paul.bakker.nl(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: This got me thinking, perhaps the Arquillian managed container should support both a remote deployment and a local deployment. The remote deployment is via the deployment APIs of a running server, whereas the local deployment is a file copy to a deployment directory. I'm hesitant to introduce another type of container in Arquillian, so perhaps it's just an aspect of a managed container...seems to fit best. Regardless, the file copy should be abstracted away as a impl detail of the container adapter. -Dan -- Dan Allen Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action Registered Linux User #231597 http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen#about http://mojavelinux.com http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction