Re: [forge-dev] Data access logic used by scaffold code

On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 18:15, Rafael Pestano <rmpestano(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: It's true. And from the conversation above, it looks like that's where we are headed. I say that because: (a) it appears the Java EE purist output is an immovable requirement (b) we definitely want to offer output that *does* use a framework for those that want it (CDI Query likely) Now, if at some point we decide that (b) isn't needed anymore, then (b) because the preferred recommendation. Yeah. Granted, (a) and (b) won't be all that different, so we certainly aren't dumping work. (b) is simply introducing a dependency that effectively trims down what (a) produces. I think Jason should proceed with what the (b) output will look like for the Open18 migration, then we can work it back into a (b) plugin. -Dan -- Dan Allen Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action Registered Linux User #231597 http://google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen http://mojavelinux.com http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction