Re: [forge-dev] trying to close the gap on a SwitchYard demo

On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Keith Babo <kbabo(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > Thinking about this more, it's possible that the template used in our > Eclipse tooling and the one used in Forge have parted. My hope is that the > Forge one still plays nicely with the new BPMN 2 editor at Eclipse, but I > have seen issues in the past. In any case, if you hit an issue, just yell > and I'm sure there's a workaround or I can push a fix pronto. > I'm sort of sensing that. The test now runs, but Eclipse thinks 50% of the lines in switchyard.xml are invalid. Since I usually don't trust Eclipse, I just ignore that fool. ...now if Eclipse would not run out of memory installing the BPM2 editor, I might be able to see where we stand on that front. -Dan -- Dan Allen Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action Registered Linux User #231597 http://google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen http://mojavelinux.com http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction