+1
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 21, 2012, at 11:12, Max Rydahl Andersen <max.andersen(a)redhat.com> wrote:
I approve of the change to EPL
On 21 Jun 2012, at 18:47, Lincoln Baxter, III wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> We would like to change Forge from the LGPL license to the EPL license; this will
remove the restriction on Plugin licensing which currently requires Plugins to be written
with a compatible open-source license. We don't want to restrict how people can
develop and distribute plugins, and the EPL license is much more permissive in this
regard; while maintaining the same open-source requirements for the core Forge framework
itself, plugins may be developed under any license a person would wish to use.
>
> Before we this change, if you have any objections, please reply now; if you are in
agreement, please respond to this email stating, "I approve of the change to
EPL."
>
> Additionally, the reason we need to ask for this permission is because some of our
contributors have not yet signed the JBoss CLA for Forge. Once we change to EPL, the CLA
will not be necessary :)
>
> Thanks all,
> --
> Lincoln Baxter, III
>
http://ocpsoft.org
> "Simpler is better."
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
_______________________________________________
forge-dev mailing list
forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev