On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 2:38 AM, Gary Brown <gbrown(a)redhat.com> wrote:
The aim is to add a "Tracing" entry as a "stage
2", but wasn't sure
whether this meant releasing a version of the website without it first, and
then introduce it as a separate step?
Stage 1 = cleanup. Stage 2 = adding things.
A general comment - perhaps we should drop the "Hawkular" part from each
component - so then we simply have "Metrics", "Alerts" and
"Tracing"?
Good suggestion about dropping Hawkular; I updated the PR.
On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 8:22 AM, Heiko Rupp <hrupp(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Hey,
>
> On 3 Jul 2017, at 23:42, Stefan Negrea wrote:
>
> > I waited about 2 weeks to allow enough time for feedback. There was a
> > good amount of initial discussion on the document mostly in the form
> > of proposals to enhance the initial plan. There were zero negative
> > comments and nobody opposed the plan.
>
> I know I did not chime in on the document, so have no right
> to complain now :-)
>
> I think though that the removal of Hawkular Services is wrong.
> It may indeed at the moment only exist for that one consumer,
> which is ManageIQ, but not listing it is in my opinion also
> confusing. Instead of removing it, we should perhaps better
> educate visitors of the web site (in a graphical way?) how this
> relates to the other projects.
> Similar to Tracing. This is no longer Hawkular APM, so it is right
> not to list Hawkular APM, but so far Tracing folks are still under the
> Hawkular umbrella and the blog contains a lot of content about it.
> _______________________________________________
> hawkular-dev mailing list
> hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
>
_______________________________________________
hawkular-dev mailing list
hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev