On 2015-04-28 13:50, Lukas Krejci wrote:
What about IDE support for Asciidoc docs? Me, I like being able to
click on
links in javadoc popups.
+1 for the question about the IDE support. Jared, do you know how does
it work in Eclipse & Co?
Regardless of the above, I do not see the need to introduce asciidoclet.
There is very little plain HTML in typical good JavaDoc and this small
amount is not worth the trouble, IMO.
-- P
On Monday, April 27, 2015 20:38:47 Jared MORGAN wrote:
> I'm coming late to the party here, so my apologies for that.
>
> I understand that docs for Hawkular will be done in Asciidoc (great move
> IMHO).
>
> Why not extend that to Javadocs:
https://github.com/asciidoctor/asciidoclet
>
> Compatible with Maven. No need to try and kludge HTML to make tables work.
> Easy to read directly in code as well as looking pretty when compiled.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> J
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
>>> Hi Jay, there is just a couple of them in Bus - see the attached file.
>>> -- P
>>
>> If everyone writes as good as javadocs as I do, I'm all for the javadoc
>> checker :-D
>> _______________________________________________
>> hawkular-dev mailing list
>> hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> hawkular-dev mailing list
> hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
_______________________________________________
hawkular-dev mailing list
hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev