10:37 a.m.
THANKS!
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 10:44 PM Jiri Kremser <jkremser(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Or is there any other way that I can exploit the latest inventory?
There is.
build the inventory:
git clone https://github.com/hawkular/hawkular-inventory.git
cd hawkular-inventory
mvn clean install -DskipTests
..and then build the services that will use the inventory snapshot version
git clone https://github.com/hawkular/hawkular-services.git
cd hawkular-services
sed -i
"s/\(<version.org.hawkular.inventory>\)[^<]*/\10.18.0.Final-SNAPSHOT/g"
./pom.xml
mvn clean install -Pdev -DskipTests
./dist/target/hawkular-*/bin/standalone.sh -Dhawkular.log.cassandra=WARN
-Dhawkular.log.inventory.rest.requests=DEBUG -Dhawkular.rest.user=jdoe
-Dhawkular.rest.password=password -Dhawkular.agent.enabled=true'
jk
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 4:11 AM, Austin Kuo <auszon3(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> When is the next inventory release because I'm waiting for the fix? Or is
> there any other way that I can exploit the latest inventory?
>
> Thanks!
> Austin Kuo <auszon3(a)gmail.xn--com>-4i3o 2016年7月21日 週四，18:34寫道：
>
>> Sure.
>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/HAWKULAR-1099
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 6:23 PM Lukas Krejci <lkrejci(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On čtvrtek 21. července 2016 10:16:27 CEST Austin Kuo wrote:
>>> > Oops, it's 0.17.2.Final. I just saw it from the browser.
>>> >
>>>
>>> Ok, then this is a bug... Would you be able to write up a JIRA for it
>>> with
>>> repro steps so that I can take a look at it?
>>>
>>> > On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 6:15 PM Austin Kuo <auszon3(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>>> > > Not sure about the version since i'm using the docker image
provide
>>> by
>>> > > pilhuhn.
>>> > > I'm try to run it directly, but how to make it run at the host
>>> 0.0.0.0
>>> > > such that I can access it from remote ?
>>> > >
>>> > > On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 5:31 PM Lukas Krejci
<lkrejci(a)redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > >> That's definitely a bug. What version of inventory are you
using?
>>> > >>
>>> > >> I think I've fixed a problem like this in 0.17.2.Final. But
of
>>> course,
>>> > >> this
>>> > >> could be a different instantiation of it.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On čtvrtek 21. července 2016 8:42:03 CEST Austin Kuo wrote:
>>> > >> > I was creating 2 different resource types with the same
http
>>> client at
>>> > >>
>>> > >> the
>>> > >>
>>> > >> > same time.
>>> > >> > But one succeed, the other failed with the response 400
and body:
>>> > >> > {
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > "errorMsg" : "The transaction has already
been closed"
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > }
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > Is it not allowed to do so?
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > Austin.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> --
>>> > >> Lukas Krejci
>>> > >>
>>> > >> _______________________________________________
>>> > >> hawkular-dev mailing list
>>> > >> hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> > >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Lukas Krejci
>>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> hawkular-dev mailing list
> hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
hawkular-dev mailing list
hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev