Le 04/02/2015 11:03, Heiko W.Rupp a écrit :
> Am 04.02.2015 um 10:57 schrieb Thomas Segismont <tsegismo(a)redhat.com>:
>
> getters/setters: sometimes your method has a meaningful name and it does
> not make any sense to write Javadoc for it.
While I agree in general, we have also seen during JON development, that we
were asked to document all methods in remote interfaces. I don't think this is a
task that we want to do retroactively in a year or two
Couldn't remote APIs be moved to their own Maven module, which would
override the default config wrt Javadoc checks?