Re: [Hawkular-dev] communty distribution question
On Apr 29, 2016, at 8:57 AM, Juraci Paixão Kröhling
<jpkroehling(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 29.04.2016 14:49, Heiko W.Rupp wrote:
> On 29 Apr 2016, at 13:41, Juraci Paixão Kröhling wrote:
>> In the end, what people will see after this 5 minutes test is not what
>> Hawkular is.
>
> So the clear suggestion and opinion here is to remove everything
> that is not absolutely required by the ManageIQ integration?
Might be, I don't know. Here we cycle back to the question about the
purpose. What's Hawkular's purpose? If our purpose is to "provide
Middleware management to ManageIQ", then why not. There are so many
interesting things to be done at Middleware management that it's a shame
we'd spend so much time on other non-core stuff…
Before making a decision one way or another, I agree with Juca that we need to answer the
question, what is the purpose of Hawkular now? Do we really have legitimate reasons to
invest the time, effort, and resources not needed for the ManageIQ integration? Maybe we
do. I don’t know. And personally, I don’t think simply growing/supporting the community is
very good motivation.